Lottonomics
Glad to hear this, it's exactly what I am trying to get across. The next value is random and regardless of
what the history/pattern looks like now, the next draw can be anything. Some might ask, "Then why analyze
the history at all?" The value that appears most within the entire matrix will also show the most drawing to
drawing. Lets say that you fill a container with marbles. 48% are red 27% are yellow and 25% are green.
Next you tumble the container so that all the colored marbles are well mixed. Now without looking you pick
out one marble. There is a 48% chance that it will be red, 27% chance that it will be yellow and 25% chance
it will be blue. To correctly use the bias tool you have to know the percentage of each possible choice. Lets
look at position-2 step-1. Group-1 has digits (0-1-2) which is 30% of the 10 possible. Group-2 contains digits
(3-4-5-6) or 40% of the total etc.... Position-1 step-1 will be different depending on the highest first digit in
the lexie.
We can see from the pic above that if you add the total hits for values 1, 2 and 3 that the total = 2509 which it the number of games
in the history for the game under analysis. 745/2509=30% 1075/2509=43% and 689/2509=27%. These follow what we would
expect the overall to be +/- the standard deviation. We must also factor in the the 5-39 matrix of 575757 total sets, the first two digit
values can only be 00 to 57 which accounts for what may seem like a lower than expected value for digit (3).
Understanding this is just the first step in being able to make a "Randomly-Logical" choice. Let me dig a little deeper. When we
highlight so many digits to use in the bias search the tool it searches the history for exact matches and then records the value that
showed in the next drawing and displays the results. These results should also be proportional to the overall. When you find a
value that looks like it dominates the list then you now have something to evaluate. There are several ways to use this information.
The first is that it could be a indication that the 2 digits being searched show that a certain digit normally is heading for a increased
hit rate or maybe that one or more values is dropping. The decision should now be based on the last 20 or so games taken from
the top line of history. If last few games show a strong hit rate for that value then then it's most likely to continue but also beware
of the the break-point. The break-point is the hard part but this is where the history can give you a little help. Lets say that the
bias results show very strong for a value of 2 and 2 has hit in the last five games. This might be the time to go with 1 or 3 but again
you have to evaluate each digit to make sure you are making the best choice. I will try to dig into this a little more but right now
I have to go. The values are always in one of three conditions. Stable=hitting within it's expected rate. Increase=hitting more than
it's expected. Decrease=falling behind it's expected. Try to spot which condition the digit is in and apply that to you analysis.
RL