Lotto synchronizer big testPrevious TopicNext Topic

Quote: Originally posted by Guru on October 09, 2003

---

it's a 2 times 4 if 4 (main guarantee)

5 times 3 if 3

71.43 % chance of 5 if 5

14.29 % chance of 6 if 6

With 10 numbers in 30 lines

---

a  "reminder"  of his claims.

 

iwillremindyouthatihavevision

posted by lottosynchronizer in the thread "a real test of a guru" ; 

"Although it does not give the consistency of the 90% guarantee (I'm dissapointed about that myself), it did manage to predict several 4, 5, 5+ and one 6 correct in my tests (aprox 100 draws tested). I am sure that if there is 1 system capable of making a jackpot dream reality (and with a reason, not pure luck), it'll be lotto synchronizer".

<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<V>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

  "reminder"  numero  dos.    ("1"  correct 6 number prediction)

    100jalapenoscoudntblurmyvision

Ok so who has bit on the dangling carrot ? And what was the cost in US dollars. And what did you win?

Dear Lotto Guru:

In this era of "try before you buy", just how many people do you think will shell out their money (especially economically middle class people like me) on a software that is yet to prove itself as big as the hype it generated?! In other words, WHERE is the "Download A 90 Days Fully Functional Trial" Link?!

I say 90 days because for the storm you generated about 'LottoSync' on this forum (and maybe other fora) the trial period should be at least in SYNC with your claims! What do you feel?!

We agree, you have invested subtantially in terms of cost, labor, and your cerebral input into a product the subject of which could well be Ph.D. thesis material (like you said in one of your posts earlier). But then without producing more powerful results and giving people chance to get the feel of it, how far is the hurry to recover your investments justified?! Think of it, my friend, this is TRY BEFORE YOU BUY Era.

As an alternative, why not post at least 12 picks for the MOST POPULAR lotto for the next 12 weeks and prove the consistency of your claims and see people rushing to click your "Buy Now" link?! For the download version, you can limit it to ONLY 7 predictions incorporating LEAST POPULAR lotto and create a SEPARATE Unlock Code sent ONLY against a valid EMail address and against a USER NAME. This way you can protect your valuable work from pirates, because they will not be exposed to your fully functional download version.

Thanks and God Bless You for your initiative in introducing a new concept of finding "order in disorder". May your product see the success, but in ITS NATURAL course!

Love All

GURU: 

red

Anyone who sent the huckster $100 based on the contents of this message thread is getting what they deserve.  I sincerely hope the members here are smarter than that.  Funny, people will go out of their way to find a gas station selling gas for a couple of pennies cheaper, but then will throw $100 out the window on something like that.

However, my guess is that no one here paid for his random number generator, er, "system".

Let's not kill the goose before the first egg.  Guru should pick a game and start posting predictions for it, if it wins the software price won't matter and if not . . .  it would be an honest test.  BobP

BobP,

I think the guy's basically run away from any "tests" after the first debacle.  Also, the fact that he's throwing a completely "untested" system onto the market for $100 demonstrates his intentions pretty clearly.  I wouldn't go holding out much hope at this point.

I'll go head-to-head with the Lottery Post Quick Picks Generator against his system any day.

I'm not running away of anything.

I'll keep posting numbers here. I'm confident the program WILL PROOVE IT'S WORTH THE 87 Euro. But you cannot expect it to hit 5 correct withing the first 5 tests or so ????

What did you expect guys, 1 Euro. We,ve worked for a year and a half intensively on this method. We are not going to charge a price that makes us feel ripped of ourselves.

If you think it's not worth the money, then don't buy it. Simple as that.

Todd

I'm sure our program has been tested a lot more on past draws than some other developers did. We did not make a fancy tool with lots of flickering lights and dozens of buttons that can do no better than guessing. We created a method with te true intension that it should really work !!! And it will.

Just wait, look and you'll dventually see it happen here right under your noses !!!

This is the beginning, not the end.

                        visiondude's  "tip of the day"...

      never allow yourself to get suckered in by "nice" and "sincere".

 people that are selling things are marketing themselves first.  that means that they use your first impression on whether their product is worthy,  by gaining your trust via selling themselves.  in the side door they come dressed all nice and pretty.  promising the world,  but delivering IRAQ. their ability to sell lay in the words and delivery and so far guru is excellant at it.

43 pages worth.

so keep your emotions/money in check for now. one thing the guy has done despite his rush to sell his system (which raises a flag),     is to continue to agree to post numbers pre draw to see if he can back it up.  i am with grandmaster todd on this one. i don't think that he can do what others can do in here for free but i sure am glad that he is still willing to put his picks where his lips have tread.

i am a heavy believer though in the "just because nobody else has done it,  doesn't mean it cannot be done"  mantra.  so i will leave the porch light on.  that is until he proves that he is no different than all the ones who have preceeded him.  then i will hang the sign outside my door "no salespersons please"...

 maintaingemotionalcontrolintherollercoasteroflifeisessentialtomaintainingvision

Guru,

I forgot to ask this before, but are your 10 picks weighted or ordered in any way, or are all 10 "equal" ? (like the first 3 are more probable to come up than the second 3, 1 thru 10 are based on some "most likely" order, etc...)

Hypersoniq:

the predicted numbers are not weighted or ordered on probability.

They are ordered beginning with the smallest ending with the biggest number.

Sorry I was unable to post