- Home
- Premium Memberships
- Lottery Results
- Forums
- Predictions
- Lottery Post Videos
- News
- Search Drawings
- Search Lottery Post
- Lottery Systems
- Lottery Charts
- Lottery Wheels
- Worldwide Jackpots
- Quick Picks
- On This Day in History
- Blogs
- Online Games
- Premium Features
- Contact Us
- Whitelist Lottery Post
- Rules
- Lottery Book Store
- Lottery Post Gift Shop
The time is now 4:26 am
You last visited
April 24, 2024, 11:30 pm
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)
Comments
Rinse and repeat:
These arrogant global control freak a$$holes actually believe, we will believe, they can affect the Earth's weather. It is all about control, and sadly, a foolish large percentage of people believe this crap. It is about the politicos taking all our freedoms and wealth away for themselves so they can rule w/o impediment, that is all. our rulers are all for it.
http://www.people.com/people/archive/article/0,,20067003,00.html
Now, in 1981, Exxon KNEW OF CLIMATE CHANGE because they were conducting studies on it. When they found out that they the impact on the ecosystem was POSITIVE, the began spending money and campaigning WITH THE DENIERS...because it would ultimately get out and would hurt their business:
http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2015/7/9/exxon-knew-of-human-role-in-climate-change-in-1981.html
-Scientists knew by the 1950s that climate change could be a risk for humanity, but it wasn’t until 1988 that it became public knowledge, after NASA scientist James Hansen testified before Congress that scientific data had confirmed human’s role in climate change, the report said. The same year, the United Nations formed the IPCC.-
-Exxon knew about the connection between fossil fuels and climate change well ahead of the rest of industry and the public, the report said. Though Exxon knew first and continued funding climate denial, other industry actors also sowed uncertainty about the human role in global warming after becoming aware of scientific evidence.-
http://climatecrocks.com/2015/07/09/documents-show-exxon-aware-of-climate-change-since-1981/
You can do your own diligence from here. You know what? If it were ever confirmed by Jesus Himself that he was more Liberal than Conservative, (and HE ALWAYS GAVE, NEVER TOOK...WAS MERCIFUL AND LIBERAL), then Republicans would stop believing in Him, stop going to Church, stop praying, they'd stop EVERYTHING 'cause they hate Liberals. Tell you what, open the door to your house, apartment etc. and back your vehicle up to the front door. Mash the pedal half way to the floor and and position it there. Then, open the door to your place and just let the fumes mix in with the air already in there...don't open any windows, either.
Let's see just how long you smart azz deniers last, okay. Better start using your brains...
Some copy/paste from today's headlines.
http://www.climatedepot.com/2015/11/29/skeptical-climate-documentary-set-to-rock-un-climate-summit-film-to-have-red-carpet-premiere-in-paris/
http://www.latimes.com/local/weather/la-me-ln-california-freeze-sierras-20151128-story.html
http://www.express.co.uk/news/science/616937/GLOBAL-COOLING-Decade-long-ice-age-predicted-as-sun-hibernates
http://news.sky.com/story/1596318/poll-growing-doubts-over-climate-change-causes
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/environment/globalwarming/11395516/The-fiddling-with-temperature-data-is-the-biggest-science-scandal-ever.html
-"There is a time lag in the climate system," he said.
"We are storing up problems that we haven't yet seen because the climate system takes decades to respond to the carbon dioxide.-
-"So even if we cut emissions dramatically today there are big problems stored up for future. This is why we need to take urgent action."-
-The film is the first climate documentary to profile scientists who have reversed their views from supporting the so-called “consensus†position to a conversion to skepticism. The film also profiles politically left scientists who have now declared themselves skeptics of man-made global warming.-
A team of European researchers have unveiled a scientific model showing that the Earth is likely to experience a “mini ice age†from 2030 to 2040 as a result of decreased solar activity.
-Their findings will infuriate environmental campaigners who argue by 2030 we could be facing increased sea levels and flooding due to glacial melt at the poles.-
Sooo, why not investigate Exxon and NASA's findings? I mean, this took place way back when it first jumped off and Exxon has the proof. All these people in your links are going after OBAMA and have said NOTHING ABOUT EXXON AND NASA. None of your Republican boys have said nothing about or Exxon and NASA. Yeah, y'all trust NASA to put a man on the moon but, NOT TO ELABORATE ON CLIMATE CHANGE, huh? Nobody wants to question Exxon, huh? Yep, you know who to stay away from. They really banned aerosols because stick deodorant wasn't getting enough business...now go Google that.
http://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/
Hell, even your boy Ted Cruz just ignored Exxon and NASA altogether and seemed to itemize the year 1998 for his argument. Finally, as for your attempting to ridicule my analogy, the Earth has an atmosphere that is SEALED, okay. Warming is plain and simply common sense. So is FREEZING. Read very carefully:
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/earth/cause-ice-age.html
ATMOSPHERIC CARBON DIOXIDE
Changes in the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere are a strong candidate to explain the overall pattern of climatic change. Carbon dioxide influences the mean global temperature through the greenhouse effect. The globally averaged surface temperature for the Earth is approximately 15 degrees Celsius, and this is due largely to the greenhouse effect. Solar radiation entering earth's atmosphere is predominantly short wave, while heat radiated from the Earth's surface is long wave. Water vapor, carbon dioxide, methane, and other trace gases in the Earth's atmosphere absorb this long wave radiation. Because the Earth does not allow this long wave radiation to leave, the solar energy is trapped and the net effect is to warm the Earth. If not for the presence of an atmosphere, the surface temperature on earth would be well below the freezing point of water.
six molecules of water plus six molecules of carbon dioxide produce one molecule of sugar plus six molecules of oxygen
This is also free moron.
I explained the equation on #8 because I knew you didn't have a clue.
Post a Comment
Please Log In
To use this feature you must be logged into your Lottery Post account.
Not a member yet?
If you don't yet have a Lottery Post account, it's simple and free to create one! Just tap the Register button and after a quick process you'll be part of our lottery community.
Register