- Home
- Premium Memberships
- Lottery Results
- Forums
- Predictions
- Lottery Post Videos
- News
- Search Drawings
- Search Lottery Post
- Lottery Systems
- Lottery Charts
- Lottery Wheels
- Worldwide Jackpots
- Quick Picks
- On This Day in History
- Blogs
- Online Games
- Premium Features
- Contact Us
- Whitelist Lottery Post
- Rules
- Lottery Book Store
- Lottery Post Gift Shop
The time is now 12:55 am
You last visited
March 29, 2024, 12:41 am
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)
"Environmental Protection Agency Reviewing Petition to Ban Lead Bullets
Published:
-
Does anyone other than me see this as a backdoor approach to implementing gun control? Or have I been reading too many conspiracy theories that I'm outta touch?
________
"Environmental Protection Agency Reviewing Petition to Ban Lead Bullets
http://weeklystandard.com/blogs/epa-reviewing-request-ban-led-bullets
Comments
The safest material to use in a bullet is lead because it is malleable and expands, preventing it from going completely through things (eg., walls) to hit innocent bystanders. The small amount of lead leaching from spent bullets in hunting areas (which are far removed from municipal water supplies) has never presented a problem in the past when many more people actively hunted for their own food. Lead is in a controlled environment at a shooting range and poses no threat. Ergo, the only reason they are doing this is to make it harder to exercise our 2nd amendment rights.
If they are so worried about the safety of lead, why is our military using depleted uranium in its munitions? Let's ask the doctors in Fallujah about the dramatic increase in birth deformities at a rate higher than the aftermath of Hiroshima.
Post a Comment
Please Log In
To use this feature you must be logged into your Lottery Post account.
Not a member yet?
If you don't yet have a Lottery Post account, it's simple and free to create one! Just tap the Register button and after a quick process you'll be part of our lottery community.
Register