Something to read and analyze. Draw your own conclusion.
http://english.aljazeera.net/indepth/opinion/2011/02/20112611181593381.html
Food for the brain [political of course] current event
Published: February 10, 2011, 7:20 pm
Comments
2.
Comment by JAP69 - February 10, 2011, 8:20 pmNow it will depend who starts the violence if any.
From the rules for radicals.
RULE 10: "If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive." Violence from the other side can win the public to your side because the public sympathizes with the underdog. (Unions used this tactic. Peaceful [albeit loud] demonstrations during the heyday of unions in the early to mid-20th Century incurred management's wrath, often in the form of violence that eventually brought public sympathy to their side.)
From the rules for radicals.
RULE 10: "If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive." Violence from the other side can win the public to your side because the public sympathizes with the underdog. (Unions used this tactic. Peaceful [albeit loud] demonstrations during the heyday of unions in the early to mid-20th Century incurred management's wrath, often in the form of violence that eventually brought public sympathy to their side.)
You must be a Lottery Post member to post comments to a Blog.
Register for a FREE membership, or if you're already a member please Log In.
Reminds me of the time Ms Pelosi with her gavel and her members marching thru the Tea Party protest during the health care thing. Could be just trying to entice violence. Did say they got spat on and derogatory remarks made. But that did not fly. Could have been trying to make the Tea Party look like an aggresive bunch.
You will find in the above article where it is mentioned what could happen if the protest turn dramatically violent. How will the demonstrators be looked upon then.