Okay, so here's an excerpt from 'roccolore' who is the second commentator down after the article:

And if Democrats are such champions of gays and women, why do they defend the Muslims who kill gays and force women into full-body potato sacks? But what do you expect from those who think cartoons are more offensive than beheadings?

What we are dealing with is Sharia Law, dude, which has been around forever in that region of the world. While their laws seem to allow such practices, it's their business, culture, religion and religion. When we go over there and attempt to tell them what they can't do to their people based on their laws, that's IMPOSING on them. They can't come over here and tell us what we can't do to them based on our laws. However, we still do seem to impose on our own citizens via Republican control and influence on specific issues. Check this excerpt and link where Bobby Jindal (R) speaks on Sharia Law:

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/397110/what-bobby-jindal-gets-about-islam-and-most-people-still-dont-andrew-c-mccarthy

Excerpt:

is not just different than our law, it’s not just a cultural difference, it is oppression and it is wrong. It subjugates women and treats them as property, and it is antithetical to valuing all of human life equally. It is the very definition of oppression. We must stop pretending otherwise.

Sharia law (Arabic: شريعة) is the body of Islamic law. The term means "way" or "path"; it is the legal framework within which the public and some private aspects of life are regulated for those living in a legal system based on Islam.

Subjugates women's rights, Bobby? Really? How about this development, article, and excerpt:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/congress/house-gop-abruptly-drops-plans-to-debate-abortion-bill/2015/01/21/d6f98708-a1e0-11e4-91fc-7dff95a14458_story.html

WOMEN HAVE A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO DECIDE WHAT HAPPENS TO THEIR BODY AND THEN GOD HAS THE LAST WORD/JUDGEMENT BASED ON THEIR RELATIONSHIP WITH HIM (FORGIVENESS). THIS SHOULD BE BETWEEN WOMAN AND GOD...PERIOD, BECAUSE REPUBLICANS CAN'T PUT ANYONE INTO HEAVEN OR HELL.

Read the caption underneath the picture in this article and then just read the article itself...here's some excerpts:

(1) Democrats said such talk showed that Republicans were willing to subjugate women’s rights to political pandering to the crowds outside.

(2) Rep. Scott DesJarlais, R-Tenn., a doctor who opposes abortion rights, once urged a patient he was dating to seek an abortion. His aides did not return phone and email requests for comment.

(Yeah, he screwed her, got her pregnant, and told her to ABORT...A REPUBLICAN DOCTOR.)

The debate took a turn for the personal when Rep. Jackie Speier, D-Calif., referred to “hypocrites on the other side of the aisle who have counseled their own girl friends to have abortions. It’s legal.”

(3) Republican leaders flinched at the prospect of forcing passage of anti-abortion legislation opposed by GOP women.

(Even Republican women don't want to be SUBJUGATED Bobby Jindal.)

Let's analyze this next excerpt by Boehner very carefully:

“This march is part of a longer one, and our destination is clear: to secure and protect the rights of every unborn child. When there is disagreement, we should pause and listen closely. When there is movement, we should rejoice, and the House’s vote to ban taxpayer funding of abortion is cause for doing so,” he said.

...to ban taxpayer funding of abortion is CAUSE FOR DOING SO.

Okay, John, then write a law for the non-funding of abortions by taxpayers ONLY and leave the whole RIGHTS thing ALONE, buddy. Republicans are trying to mix the two ideals here...religion and money. While the Separation of Church and State isn't in the Constitution, it's still a valid ideal based around separating personal emotions from law implementation.

I saved Sarah for last because the other issues I discussed had way more relevance and priority to this BS. As I said in another article, if the President were to treat only blacks in a special way (partiality) and only did things specific to them while restricting others, that would be...

dis·crim·i·na·tion


/dəˌskriməˈnāSH(ə)n/


noun

noun: discrimination; plural noun: discriminations

1.

the unjust or prejudicial treatment of different categories of people or things, especially on the grounds of race, age, or sex.
"victims of racial discrimination"

synonyms: prejudice, bias, bigotry, intolerance, narrow-mindedness, unfairness, inequity, favoritism, one-sidedness, partisanship; More
sexism, chauvinism, misogyny, racism, racialism, anti-Semitism, heterosexism, ageism, classism, casteism;

historicalapartheid

"racial discrimination"

See, Sarah says Democrats but she's actually targeting Obama and BLACKS. Then, we have that other article where the black guy is so angry because the President DOESN'T HELP BLACKS ENOUGH, y'all. So, here we a President that seems to not help blacks enough while also discriminating against whites. If you're not really, really careful and doing your diligence, it's very easy to miss what's really going on, America. Pay attention.