
Senator says it's good but not enough, again calls to "end" the Texas Lottery
By Kate Northrop
A Texas Senator introduced a bill that would prohibit lottery retailers from selling tickets to an individual or group that is attempting to purchase all possible number combinations in a drawing.
In another effort to deter future purchasing groups from near-guaranteeing multi-million jackpot wins, a Texas Senator presented a bill that targets retailers who sell tickets to those they know are attempting a jackpot buyout.
On Monday, lawmakers gathered at a Senate Committee on State Affairs hearing, where they discussed Senate Bill 1346. It's another proposed solution that aims to prevent someone from purchasing possible number combinations in drawing, which Senator Bryan Hughes, the sponsor of the bill, labeled as "trying to cheat."
It puts the responsibility of halting buyout attempts on the retailers, including both brick-and-mortar stores and courier services. Retailers could lose their lottery license and would be unable to reapply for a new license until a year after the revocation if they are found to be in violation.
The onus on retailers has everything to do with the $95 million Lotto Texas jackpot buyout event in April 2023, in which some courier services privately worked with an international syndicate known as Rook TX to automate the ticket buying process using QR codes and quickly print tickets for nearly every combination within 72 hours. The operation was planned in Malta and funded by a London-based betting company, Hughes said during the hearing.
"Clearly, this type of organized activity undermines the integrity and the fairness of the lottery," Hughes said. "As we heard many times, Texans buying those tickets thought they had a chance at that jackpot, but they really didn't."
The bill targets retailers who "knowingly" sell or allow the sale of lottery tickets to someone attempting a buyout, not the individual or group who purchases the tickets.
"A sales agent may not knowingly sell or allow the sale of tickets for a lottery game involving a drawing to one or more persons attempting to purchase all possible winning tickets for the drawing," the bill currently reads.
Hughes clarified that the bill's wording will change from a person or persons attempting to buy "all" possible winning tickets to "substantially all" the possible combinations.
Even so, the wording of the bill and lack of a specific ticket limit calls into question how a retailer would define "substantially all" ticket combinations. It is still possible to attempt a jackpot buyout without the aid of courier services, as described in Lottery Post's investigation, in which an organized group may coordinate a network of buyers to visit retailers throughout the state and purchase all combinations across the group. It has happened before.
If someone buys a lesser number of tickets than "substantially all," say, 1,000 tickets, is a brick-and-mortar retailer required by law to report it? What legally defines "substantially all?"
Regardless of what transpires on the retailer end, the Texas Lottery will notice when there is a jackpot buyout attempt since they have access to sales data, such as where tickets were sold, and insights on the total number of combinations sold after every drawing, also known as coverage. They can easily see, based on the coverage for a drawing, whether someone has tried to buy all or most possible combinations.
In other words, the real responsibility of this proposed bill seems misdirected. In line with the bill's logic, the responsibility should be on the Lottery to determine whether "substantially all" combinations have been sold and whether that ambiguous threshold has been crossed to nullify the "win" and warrant a jackpot rollover.
Either way, lawmakers in the Senate hearing voiced overwhelming support for the bill, with Senator Bob Hall even calling for a "lifetime" suspension of a license for violators instead of one year.
While he called it a "good bill," Hall took it a step further, arguing that Legislature should "end" the Texas Lottery since he believes the $95 million Lotto Texas jackpot buyout was orchestrated by government Lottery officials. He has been an outspoken advocate for defunding the Lottery in the past.
"This is good, but what I've learned in this is that these [purchasing groups] are very, very smart people," Hall said. "This is just one way to cheat the system. From what I've found... there are other ways the system is being cheated, and this [the bill] will take out one, but I think the only cure for the problem of the people of Texas being cheated out of money through the lottery system that we have is to end it. If we find this kind of corruption in something as benign as a lottery system, think what kind of corruption and thievery we'll have of the people if we expand gambling here in Texas."
Hall additionally accused the Lottery of "setting it up" and adjusting its own rules to specifically facilitate the buyout, which Texas Lottery Executive Director Ryan Mindell has consistently denied at previous meetings.
"The terminal deployment process is not embodied in the rules, and so that was one of the first things that I changed when I became Executive Director, saying that the way that we deployed terminals in April 2023 was not appropriate," Mindell said.
Mindell also explained that he and the Texas Lottery Commission are in the process of revoking licenses of retailers who used inappropriate QR codes or were not in involved in a business other than selling lottery tickets at the time of the buyout. They have also been working to unwind many of the rules that have made it possible for courier services to operate in Texas.
In a final question to Mindell, Hall asked why Legislature should trust that the Lottery Commission won't once again "beat the system" and "cheat the public out of money" in the future.
"Senator, I really appreciate the question," Mindell responded. "That's something that I'm very focused on, and that's why, since I've become Executive Director, we've changed the processes, we've updated the rules, we've now banned couriers and are taking action against them. As long as I am Executive Director, we are going to continue to work and be better and work on improving the trust both of the Legislature and the public."
Buying more lottery tickets increases your chances of winning a lottery jackpot, if you can afford to lose more money.
Does not Go far Enough Triple tax them to 75 percent fraud Tax.
One thing for sure, they can't try this with the $5 MM tickets or PB
let them move in to another state
Really?
Basically you're saying you can only bet on losing combinations.....if some has the means to purchase however many tickets they want, and you're putting a "governor" on their bets, you're limiting their options and you should be sued, or all gamblers should boycott your lottery, and play in other states!!
is it just me, or is this incredibly stupid and impossible to enforce?
Whut haz Ole Stat$ been tellin ya all theze yrz?...
No insult can be mooe BLATANT..
Dem Texanz are just BIGger foolz. az everythang iz bigger in Texez..!
Yes, there are some people that are just this clueless. Even state senators.
It's not like these retailers would lie and say, "I had no clue this guy buying 157, 647 tickets was attempting a lottery buyout."
Remember, this is the same state where they lauded Albert DiSalvo, the Boston Strangler, for population control. Clueless?
It's great they are taking this seriously but a waste of taxpayer dollars to write an unenforceable law.
Yea, but MM just basically shot themselves in da foot, by pricing the Game outta the handz of the average playa that keepz the Game alive..!!
Wit the price of Eggz @ $7. a dozen..
who'z gonna buy a $5. riggin rippawupfh?.. Eggz would be much moe fulfillin..
Not just you
"calls into question how a retailer would define "substantially all" ticket combinations. "
Do these clowns know anything about how the lottery works? I'm pretty sure none of the syndicates tried by sending dozens or hundreds of people to retailers with an (already obvious) shopping bag full of official bet slips. I've also got a crazy idea that, just maybe, some state agency has a computer with the ability to tracks ticket sales. Oh, wait, they already know that.
"Triple tax them to 75 percent fraud Tax "
You know that In Texas they're currently paying 0%, so tripling it will make it (checks calculator twice) 0% tax. Of course Texas could introduce their own state tax on jackpot wins if there was an unusually large purchase. More importantly, they could try to get an IRS rule capping allowable deductions for lottery losses and impose one of their own on a state tax. Set it at $1 million and it will never penalize a normal player, but it adds a significant cost to anyone that spends $25 million to win $57 million.
"if some has the means to purchase however many tickets they want, and you're putting a "governor" on their bets"
I'd agree completely if I didn't have any clue at all about how many tickets a normal player might buy and how many tickets it takes to justify risking millions of dollars.
"is this incredibly stupid and impossible to enforce?"
The basic idea isn't stupid, and it's potentially easy to enforce. It's also potentially easy to enforce unfairly but I don't think it's difficult to do it fairly.
"I had no clue this guy buying 157, 647 tickets was attempting a lottery buyout."
You'd have to be extraordinarily stupid to not know that buying that many tickets is incredibly unusual, and the lottery knows it would take far more tickets to have a reasonable chance. That means that the same thing is happening elsewhere, the lottery will know about it, and they should notify retailers as soon as they identify the attempt. If the same retailer continues to sell vastly more tickets than usual they'll know what's going on.
Exactly. So one can buy 50% of all combinations? It is void for vagueness.
Yes and there lies the catch-22. We ALL would love to buy more lottery tickets to increase our chance of winning the jackpot, but when a large group gathers to buy all the number combinations, something about that seems unfair. This is especially true for the average person who can only afford to buy between 1-10 tickets at a time. The average person would seem to have a smaller chance of winning the jackpot, when a large group swoops in and buys up all the numbers. Then there is the matter of where is this large group getting the millions of dollars from to buy all the number combinations. Is it a legitimate group or a money laundering organization. At some point if these large groups are allowed to continue buying all the combinations to this particular lottery game, then the average person will no longer play that game and lottery will eventually discontinue the game.
A similar thing happened in Michigan in 2003 with Jerry and Marge Selbee. Jerry was a math genius and figured out a loophole in the Winfall lottery game. He and his wife were able to win millions of dollars for their family and community. At the same time some MIT college students figured out the same loophole and were doing the same thing. At some point the lottery commission became suspicious and discontinued the game. Of course Hollywood turned this into a movie, Jerry & Marge Go Large. I really enjoyed the movie
The lottery is not rigged. There are countless people who win the lottery on a daily basis in every state that has the lottery. The media only report on those people who win enormous jackpots. For all you conspiracy theorist out there, you think the lottery is rigged. A solution to your problem is, don't play since you think it is rigged. Playing the lottery is NOT a requirement in life.