<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>South Carolina Mid &#x26; Eve</title>
		<link>https://blogs.lotterypost.com/jap69/2016/1/south-carolina-mid-eve.htm</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/blogcomments/108926" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>JAP69's Blog: South Carolina Mid &#x26; Eve</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Original Blog Entry: South Carolina Mid &#x26; Eve</title>
			<link>https://blogs.lotterypost.com/jap69/2016/1/south-carolina-mid-eve.htm</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://blogs.lotterypost.com/jap69/2016/1/south-carolina-mid-eve.htm</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2016 18:35:54 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>JAP69</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>You know what I think about mid and eve pair selection boxes separated by draw.<br /><br />That 787 was drawn last night from the Mid-Day sheet.<br /><br />Mid day draws<br /><br />Pairs not drawn over 30 days<br /><br />**, 15,19<br /><br />22, 24,25,28<br /><br />33, 36,37<br /><br />**, 45, 46,<br /><br />**, 58<br /><br />66, 69<br /><br />77, 78,<br /><br />88, 89,<br /><br />Now with no draw on Mid-Day Sundays and the test draws they do before mid or eve actual draw throws the cycle off.<br /><br />Why not keep the draws separate but choose from both mid and eve charts to play both mid and eve.<br /><br />I have not tracked this too long but I have seen this flip flop occur before.<br /><br />Use gut instinct I think.<br /><br />... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://blogs.lotterypost.com/jap69/2016/1/south-carolina-mid-eve.htm">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Blog Entry</category>
			<category>JAP69</category>
			<wfw:comment>https://www.lotterypost.com/blogentry/108926</wfw:comment>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

