Attention All Bloggers!

Comment #28

Todd — Thu, 19 Oct 2006 14:34:17 GMT

True, also look at the huge cuts at the New York Times -- the agenda-setter of the fringe left. Sinking circulation and profits. Seems people don't like left-wing agenda disguised as hard news. They even fired the main editorial editor within the past week, someone who has been there a long time and shaped their radical left editorial page.

Comment #27

konane — Thu, 19 Oct 2006 13:33:30 GMT

BTW, I don't agree with everything the administration does and have covered the unimpeded INVASION ad nauseum on my blog. I dug my heels in as if rooted in place and not giving an inch on that issue. My senators know my feelings on that too because I've emailed them. Backing up my statement about NBC reorgainizing, I found this article with link this morning ...... "Big changes, job losses coming at NBC News MSNBC to close N.J. headquarters; operations consolidating across d... [ More ]

Comment #26

Todd — Thu, 19 Oct 2006 11:50:27 GMT

Ancient Chinese proverb: "Logic falls on deaf ears".

Comment #25

LOTTOMIKE — Thu, 19 Oct 2006 07:37:38 GMT

good to see i'm not the only one that is paranoid about the government these days.nope my kool aid wasn't spiked.....

Comment #24

Tenaj — Thu, 19 Oct 2006 06:57:37 GMT

tst tst tst

Comment #23

Rick G — Thu, 19 Oct 2006 05:52:26 GMT

And I thought my paranoia ran deep. But each to their own. You're worried about the Dixie Boys and I'm worried about the US Gov't. Guess we'll never reconcile that one.

Comment #22

konane — Thu, 19 Oct 2006 03:38:33 GMT

IF I said I hated the president in 1997 I would not have worried about treason charges but YES would have worried about the Dixie Mafia Clinton is alleged to have close ties to, or whatever other mechanism so many people woke up dead from while he was president. I was YES very concerned about the PC mafia rampant in Washington during that era enforcing the re-education machine.

Comment #21

Rick G — Thu, 19 Oct 2006 02:45:27 GMT

Granted, on the right to interview her. From the nature of her comments it was appropriate. I'm not disagreeing with that. It could have been handled better considering the source of the perceived threat and the S.S. agents' conversation with the parents prior to the school intrusion. The end result, he has gained a stronger enemy and she has peers. She wins, he loses. Sure, she and her friends can't vote for ten years but who is she going to vote for when she can vote (assuming we s... [ More ]

Comment #20

konane — Thu, 19 Oct 2006 02:12:27 GMT

Federal authorities are bound by law to investigate any threat against the president, period. They always have, they always will. Now in the information age we know about when they did and a reporter gets to publish a story about it. That's the only difference.... nothing has changed. I would expect if I had a child post something like that on a public forum to be seen all over the world that the Secret Service, FBI would be all over my family like white on rice. I would exp... [ More ]

Comment #19

Rick G — Thu, 19 Oct 2006 01:30:34 GMT

Second of all, I am damned glad I was born here and my family moved to this country in 1680 from Scotland, so do not patronize me about how I should be glad I live in this country. My family and many others like us had a part in forming this country so that people like you could speak freely. None of those people would have condoned jack-booted government agents to pull a 13 year old girl out of her class for interrogation for comments against the president under any circumstances whatso... [ More ]

Comment #18

konane — Thu, 19 Oct 2006 01:00:52 GMT

Calls to riot in the terms I stated were meant to throw the nation into turbulence. Go to any moonbat hate site, read what is being written that is hateful, calling for the death of someone and you'll know where the line is. You'll know when the line is crossed by the language used. Actually I don't give a flying flip what the world thinks of the US courtesy of the MSM portraying a totally different picture than how it really is. We are the only nation the world h... [ More ]

Comment #17

Rick G — Thu, 19 Oct 2006 00:05:42 GMT

"Calls to riot"....so that means no more freedom of assembly? What exactly are the lines being drawn here? The semantics have suddenly become very important. Please explain. You must have some inside info that we don't. For the love of God can someone on this planet please explain this nightmare??? We are becoming the laughing stock of the world because we are proclaiming democracy and human rights and are abusing every single one of our tenets that we flaunt so b... [ More ]

Comment #16

konane — Wed, 18 Oct 2006 23:18:13 GMT

Unless a specific blog is a watering hole drawing known or potential terrorists for the above it seems there is little to worry about.

Comment #15

Rick G — Wed, 18 Oct 2006 22:55:59 GMT

True, you are able to speak your viewpoints freely on your blog, but they agree with the regime. The question remains, will I still be able to speak my viewpoints that are against the regime? That has been opened to debate. Who will be my attorney, the judge and jury in my trial for speaking against this regime? ...a military tribunal? Will my guilt be based on the Military Commissions Act of 2006? Freedom of speech applies to every single citizen of this country,... [ More ]

Comment #14

konane — Wed, 18 Oct 2006 22:11:33 GMT

<br

Comment #13

konane — Wed, 18 Oct 2006 22:00:52 GMT

Tin foil hats refers to conspiracy hatching people who have nothing better to do than sit around in a puddle of paranoia. NBC is suffering market losses from being so far left in their agenda reporting masked as news. The big 3 and CNN market shares are down while FoxNews which is fair and balanced is UP. I'm old enough to remember when the big 3 reported news as news like FoxNews does. However, the big 3 have been hijacked by the left which began under Clinton and the FBI fi... [ More ]

Comment #12

Rick G — Wed, 18 Oct 2006 21:37:15 GMT

I'm not familiar with Todd's and Konane's references to tin-foil hats because I'm not a "party boy". I'm assuming it has something to do with Rush's medicinal deliveries.

Comment #11

Rick G — Wed, 18 Oct 2006 21:33:47 GMT

MSM is going down before bloggers and NBC facing layoffs and market pressure? HUH??? I don't understand that response and its relevance to the topic. Aren't you concerned that your rights as an American citizen are being stripped away daily in the guise of the perpetual "War on Terror", "War on Drugs", War on (fill in the blank)? This isn't empty political rhetoric...it's the real deal and flippant party responses don't answer the serious questions we face... [ More ]

Comment #10

Todd — Wed, 18 Oct 2006 21:19:26 GMT

LOL! Love the "tin foil hats" reference -- makes me LOL every time! Those three words sum up what I was trying to say much more succinctly.

Comment #9

konane — Wed, 18 Oct 2006 21:15:00 GMT

Come to think of it I read NBC is facing layoffs, so market pressure is taking its course. Smile. Agree with Todd, too much Kool Aid, too many tin foil hats writing that stuff.

Comment #8

Rick G — Wed, 18 Oct 2006 20:59:13 GMT

"Any person subject to this chapter who, in breach of an allegiance or duty to the United States, knowingly and intentionally aids an enemy of the United States, or one of the co-belligerents of the enemy, shall be punished as a military commission under this chapter may direct." This is an interesting subsection. If I say the war in Iraq is wrong, am I in breach of an allegiance to the United States as it could be percieved as "knowingly and intentionally" aiding terrori... [ More ]

Comment #7

LOTTOMIKE — Wed, 18 Oct 2006 20:33:56 GMT

thanks rick.i'm already planning a party for '08 when the door hits bush in the butt on the way out.

Comment #6

Todd — Wed, 18 Oct 2006 20:32:06 GMT

You can read the news and make whatever you like out of it, but it doesn't make you correct. Anyone who spends time learning about warefare knows that part of it is not just blowing things up -- it's called "psych-ops", and it's designed to attack an enemy from different sides without firing a shot. Since most information is disseminated on the Internet, I would be shocked if the government did not try to attack the enemy that way too. For you to make the jump from p... [ More ]

Comment #5

Rick G — Wed, 18 Oct 2006 20:22:59 GMT

The Military Commissions Act of 2006 is a fact, signed into law. It is there for all to read and abide by. It is purposefully left wide open to interpretation. Current interpretation of laws is being done by the Legislative Branch of our government, not the Supreme Court as laws were intended to be interpreted and since the Executive Branch appoints those Supreme Court justices, and approved by a Congress whose majority blindly supports their leader, it is a moot point anyway. <br... [ More ]

Comment #4

Todd — Wed, 18 Oct 2006 19:47:51 GMT

Oh please, that's a finge-left conspiracy web site, and a ridiculous proposition. To read anything there as fact is beneath you.

Comment #3

Rick G — Wed, 18 Oct 2006 17:45:12 GMT

It might strike you as "silly". I don't find systematically nullifying the Bill of Rights "silly". "Scary" might be a better word. This isn't a left-wing/right-wing, Democrat/Republican issue...it's an American issue, and the truth is in the laws being passed (by both parties, I might add).

Comment #2

emilyg — Wed, 18 Oct 2006 17:36:21 GMT

strongly reminds me of another time in my life.

Comment #1

Todd — Wed, 18 Oct 2006 17:35:53 GMT

Silly left-wing propaganda.

Original Blog Entry: Attention All Bloggers!

Rick G — Wed, 18 Oct 2006 17:02:21 GMT