Comment #3

jarasan — Thu, 15 Dec 2016 04:47:43 GMT

Excellent point MD!

Comment #2

MADDOG10 — Thu, 15 Dec 2016 02:58:06 GMT

You'll never see the evidence, because there isn't ANY..

Comment #1

jarasan — Thu, 15 Dec 2016 02:26:16 GMT

Peter King has been trying to get them down to committee hearings to SEE the evidence for the conclusion................he has been stone walled by the traitorous CIA demoncRAT operatives.

Original Blog Entry: Someone Has Officially Called The CIA's Bluff Over Russia

emilyg — Thu, 15 Dec 2016 01:12:11 GMT

Someone Has Officially Called The CIA's Bluff Over Russia

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-12-14/someone-has-officially-called-cias-bluff-over-russia

The scapegoating of Russia is now so widespread, Dirty Wars author and investigative journalist Jeremy Scahill took to The Intercept to call the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) on its bluff.

In the article, Obama Must Declassify Evidence Of Russian Hacking, Scahill and Jon Schwartz called out U.S. intelligence agencies for their record of deceit, asserting that the American people are not going to simply take their word for it.

U.S. intelligence agencies have repeatedly demonstrated that they regularly both lie and get things horribly wrong, the article argues. But when it comes to the CIA's case against Russia's alleged interference with the latest U.S. presidential elections, it's impossible to claim the hearsay is based on facts if evidence is not made available to support the agency's claims.

*snip to conform to copyright laws*

Caitlin Johnstone put it best in an article for Newslogue:

Believing something the CIA says is like trusting a meth addict with your car, and trusting the CIA when they're working with the Washington Post is like trusting a meth addict with your car and leaving your kid in the back seat with the house keys and money for Taco Bell.

*******************

... [ More ]