<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>Atlantic Cyclone Power Observational Bias Update</title>
		<link>https://blogs.lotterypost.com/jadelottery/2017/11/atlantic-cyclone-power-observational-bias-upd.htm</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/blogcomments/129031" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>JADELottery's Blog: Atlantic Cyclone Power Observational Bias Update</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Original Blog Entry: Atlantic Cyclone Power Observational Bias Update</title>
			<link>https://blogs.lotterypost.com/jadelottery/2017/11/atlantic-cyclone-power-observational-bias-upd.htm</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://blogs.lotterypost.com/jadelottery/2017/11/atlantic-cyclone-power-observational-bias-upd.htm</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2017 17:54:17 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>JADELottery</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Below are graphs of our calculated values of Atlantic Cyclone Power of each event.<br /><br />You&#x27;ll notice there is no Y-axis scale.<br /><br />That&#x27;s not a problem, because, all we want to show is relative power between events.<br /><br />Also, for the same justification that some professionals have used the presentation of data in the anomaly format.<br /><br />Don&#x27;t like it, Go Function Yourself.<br /><br />This graph show all the power values with any observational bias due to policy and/or technology.<br /><br />Just looking at this we can see there are some differences between year ranges.<br /><br />We detected at least 6 different ranges and have highlighted those suspected years.<br /><br />The differences seem a little more clear.<br /><br />Below, we have changed the Y-axis to a Logarithmic scale, and the range differences become even more clear.<br /><br />We can adjust for these differences to make the values relatively matched for the changes in policy/technology.<br /><br />Here we can see the graph with these observational bias removed.<br /><br />Next, we can average these yearly, non-linear values in to a yearly average.<br /><br />Below is the adjusted yearly averages for cyclone power.<br /><br />We can see around 1947 the power has been fairly level till about 1999, then peaks at 2005 and comes down.<br /><br />It has risen by looking at the Regression Wave, but next year&#x27;s average may play a factor in the direction of the Regression Wave.<br /><br />The next 3 years could be interesting.<br /><br />... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://blogs.lotterypost.com/jadelottery/2017/11/atlantic-cyclone-power-observational-bias-upd.htm">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Blog Entry</category>
			<category>JADELottery</category>
			<wfw:comment>https://www.lotterypost.com/blogentry/129031</wfw:comment>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

