<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>What Are The Odds?</title>
		<link>/blogentry/148768</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/blogcomments/148768" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>mikeintexas's Blog: What Are The Odds?</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Comment #5</title>
			<link>/blogentry/148768#c210963</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">/blogentry/148768#c210963</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 26 Oct 2019 14:50:36 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>mikeintexas</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>&#x3c;br /&#x3e;They&#x27;re also called &#x22;politicians&#x22;. &#x3c;br /&#x3e;&#x3c;br /&#x3e;Abraham Lincoln had a very good quote: &#x22;Most of what you read on the Internet is not true.</p>]]></description>
			<category>mikeintexas</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Comment #4</title>
			<link>/blogentry/148768#c210960</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">/blogentry/148768#c210960</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 26 Oct 2019 11:01:10 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>music*</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Lots of humor in those quotes.  Prime Minister Winston Churchill probably learned his craft from Prime minister Benjamin Disraeli.&#x3c;br /&#x3e;  &#x3c;br /&#x3e; So called experts and their made up stat&#x27;s. Be aware of frauds.</p>]]></description>
			<category>music*</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Comment #3</title>
			<link>/blogentry/148768#c210959</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">/blogentry/148768#c210959</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 26 Oct 2019 10:54:28 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>mikeintexas</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Or would it be that 78.6% of all statistics are made up on the spot?</p>]]></description>
			<category>mikeintexas</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Comment #2</title>
			<link>/blogentry/148768#c210951</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">/blogentry/148768#c210951</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 26 Oct 2019 02:06:21 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>mikeintexas</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Would that be the quote about the three kinds of lies? I&#x27;ve read that&#x27;s attributed to Mark Twain, but it actually originated from the British prime minister Benjamin Disraeli</p>]]></description>
			<category>mikeintexas</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Comment #1</title>
			<link>/blogentry/148768#c210950</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">/blogentry/148768#c210950</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 26 Oct 2019 01:30:30 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>music*</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>You do know what they say about statistics?  Thanks for the amusing blog.</p>]]></description>
			<category>music*</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Original Blog Entry: What Are The Odds?</title>
			<link>/blogentry/148768</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">/blogentry/148768</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 26 Oct 2019 00:31:46 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>mikeintexas</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I was reading an article online with the local classic rock station on and the radio jock starting talking about odds of things happening. I wasn&#x27;t paying much attention, but he mentioned the odds of winning the lottery, then went on with other long odds of things happening to you. It wasn&#x27;t until the last bit of information he mentioned that my ears perked up.<br /><br />I did not remember all the numbers, but I went to see the odds of playing the lottery. From Wonderopolis:<br /><br />In a lottery in which you pick 6 numbers from a possible pool of 49 numbers, your chances of winning the jackpot (correctly choosing all 6 numbers drawn) are 1 in 13,983,816. That&#x27;s 1 shot in almost 14 million.<br /><br />If you were to buy one lottery ticket each week in such a scenario, you could expect to win once every 269,000 years.<br /><br />That&#x27;s pretty good odds compared to the Mega Millions jackpot. According to Wikipedia the odds of hitting a jackpot on that game are 302,575,350 to 1.<br /><br />Of course, if you want a little better odds than that, then you can play Powerball, which according to Wiki has odds of only 1 in 292,201,338 of winning the big prize.<br /><br />I don&#x27;t remember all the categories - but the last couple - the radio jock brought up, but northjersey.com claims that you have a much better chance of being killed by a vending machine 112 million to one - than winning either the Powerball or Mega Millions. They also say it&#x27;s a much better bet that an asteroid will hit the Earth, 1-75,000. Also, the article says the odds of finding a four-leaf clover are 1-10,000 and being hit by lightning 1 in 15,300.<br /><br />I wonder what the odds are of being hit by lightning AND an asteroid while looking for a four-leaf clover?<br /><br />Never mind.<br /><br />Anyway, the radio jock went on with some odds I found distressing and unlike the other millions to one odds, I remembered these. He said the odds of a man cheating on his wife were 1 in 5. That upset me for some reason, even though I knew deep down that was fairly accurate. I&#x27;m just proud that when I was married, I was one of the four faithful guys.<br /><br />The other stat that bothered me was in the same category, namely that 1 in 7.5 women cheated on their husbands. I&#x27;m certain that my ex was one of those 6.5 faithful women.<br /><br />Which brings me to something about that last stat; just exactly how does one cheat with .5 of a person, half a woman? Would that be the top half? Just guessing, but I&#x27;d say it would have to be the bottom half to really fall under the definition of cheating, but that&#x27;s just my twisted mind. What&#x27;s even more twisted is the thought of the woman being half a woman vertically...split right down the middle<br /><br />I guess that could be the case, more than the top/bottom scenarios. After all, the odds of a woman having conjoined twins is 1-200,000....and if they had been separated, and a man cheated with one of the twins, that technically would be the point 5 of a woman, right?<br /><br />I guess if a guy cheated with BOTH of the still-joined twins, that would skew the statistics, right? Would you count that as one or TWO of that 7.5 figure?<br /><br />What&#x27;s really twisted is me thinking about stuff like this. Trust me, the odds of me doing THAT is pretty much a sure thing.<br /><br />... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="/blogentry/148768">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Blog Entry</category>
			<category>mikeintexas</category>
			<wfw:comment>https://www.lotterypost.com/blogentry/148768</wfw:comment>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

