<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>Finite Random Selection and the &#x27;You can&#x27;t predict&#x27; Paradox</title>
		<link>https://blogs.lotterypost.com/jadelottery/2007/3/finite-random-selection-and-the-you-cant-pr.htm</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/blogcomments/15367" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>JADELottery's Blog: Finite Random Selection and the &#x27;You can&#x27;t predict&#x27; Paradox</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Comment #5</title>
			<link>https://blogs.lotterypost.com/jadelottery/2007/3/finite-random-selection-and-the-you-cant-pr.htm#c13620</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://blogs.lotterypost.com/jadelottery/2007/3/finite-random-selection-and-the-you-cant-pr.htm#c13620</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 19:58:46 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>truecritic</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I would still place a higher value to the word predict than I would to a guess or random.&#xa0; &#xa0; I do believe &#x22;You can&#x27;t predict&#x22; is a false statement.&#xa0; &#xa0;Doesn&#x27;t mean the prediction will be correct but I definitely think you can sometimes predict future events in a precise manner.</p>]]></description>
			<category>truecritic</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Comment #4</title>
			<link>https://blogs.lotterypost.com/jadelottery/2007/3/finite-random-selection-and-the-you-cant-pr.htm#c13619</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://blogs.lotterypost.com/jadelottery/2007/3/finite-random-selection-and-the-you-cant-pr.htm#c13619</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 19:27:24 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>JADELottery</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Each pill consists of many molecules or parts and must integrate itself into the host subject over time to provide a result over time or a continuous interval of time. A prediction would be the individual molecules and their individual interaction with the host&#x27;s molecular structure. Since no Drug testing trial can be based on an individual molecule, many molecules are administered in the form of a pill or many predictions are conducted over a smaller interval of time relative to the whole Exper... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://blogs.lotterypost.com/jadelottery/2007/3/finite-random-selection-and-the-you-cant-pr.htm#c13619">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>JADELottery</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Comment #3</title>
			<link>https://blogs.lotterypost.com/jadelottery/2007/3/finite-random-selection-and-the-you-cant-pr.htm#c13613</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://blogs.lotterypost.com/jadelottery/2007/3/finite-random-selection-and-the-you-cant-pr.htm#c13613</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 13:31:35 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>truecritic</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>&#x3c;br /&#x3e;Think of a Doctor, prescibes 10 pills to be taken 1 per day (10 days total).&#x3c;br /&#x3e;The entire bottle is a continous interval, right?&#xa0; &#xa0;I would call each individual pill a prediction.&#xa0; &#xa0;They each perform in a &#x22;predictable&#x22; way.&#xa0; &#xa0;If the same bottle of pills contained 10 different types of pills chosen at random and all had different types of expected results, I would call that either &#x22;guessing or random.&#x22;&#x3c;br</p>]]></description>
			<category>truecritic</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Comment #2</title>
			<link>https://blogs.lotterypost.com/jadelottery/2007/3/finite-random-selection-and-the-you-cant-pr.htm#c13606</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://blogs.lotterypost.com/jadelottery/2007/3/finite-random-selection-and-the-you-cant-pr.htm#c13606</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 09:05:13 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>JADELottery</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p></p>]]></description>
			<category>JADELottery</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Comment #1</title>
			<link>https://blogs.lotterypost.com/jadelottery/2007/3/finite-random-selection-and-the-you-cant-pr.htm#c13605</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://blogs.lotterypost.com/jadelottery/2007/3/finite-random-selection-and-the-you-cant-pr.htm#c13605</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 08:53:36 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>truecritic</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>In my mind, the word predict, would include to be able to do it in a repeatable manner.&#xa0; &#xa0; I don&#x27;t raise a simple &#x22;guess or random act&#x22; to the level of predict.</p>]]></description>
			<category>truecritic</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Original Blog Entry: Finite Random Selection and the &#x27;You can&#x27;t predict&#x27; Paradox</title>
			<link>https://blogs.lotterypost.com/jadelottery/2007/3/finite-random-selection-and-the-you-cant-pr.htm</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://blogs.lotterypost.com/jadelottery/2007/3/finite-random-selection-and-the-you-cant-pr.htm</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 08:10:51 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>JADELottery</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p></p>]]></description>
			<category>Blog Entry</category>
			<category>JADELottery</category>
			<wfw:comment>https://www.lotterypost.com/blogentry/15367</wfw:comment>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

