This is for people who don't understand why Trump's court cases weren't taken into consideration

Comment #9

Stack47 — Sat, 30 Jan 2021 05:30:50 GMT

Remember when Sean Spicer with a straight face and serious as a heart attack said there were more people at Trump's inauguration than any inauguration or Kelly Ann's "alternate facts? Bet lots of Republicans wanted to grab Trump's cell phone and throw it into the deepest place in the Potomac River.

Comment #8

noise-gate — Fri, 29 Jan 2021 15:24:19 GMT

After all wasn’t it Trump himself that said “ don’t mail in your ballots?” For a President that never yawned in public, that was foolish advice. I was waiting for Georgian Republicans to conduct a test of the Dominion machines to see whether Ossoff & Wanock were the True winners. I am still waiting..

Comment #7

Stack47 — Thu, 28 Jan 2021 22:53:10 GMT

N-G, Had Amy Barrett been Trump's choice instead of Brett Kavanaugh, she would easily be confirmed by the Senate, but the rush to get another Conservative on the Court made it difficult. For years Constitutional scholars will be debating why Trump and some Republicans in the Senate thought the Supreme Court had the authority to overturn several state elections in Trump's favor with no proof and no substantial evidence. Or worse believing three Justices would rule in Trump's favor because he appointed them.... [ More ]

Comment #6

Stack47 — Thu, 28 Jan 2021 22:41:58 GMT

This “irreducible constitutional minimum” of standing has three elements: (1) the plaintiff has suffered a concrete injury; (2) that injury is fairly traceable to actions of the defendant; and (3) it must be likely—not merely speculative—that the injury will be redressed by a favorable decision." Lawyers like Sidney Powell, Orly Taitz, and Lin Wood try to test the legal standing limits and courts have admonished them and occasionally fine them for wasting the court's time debati... [ More ]

Comment #5

noise-gate — Thu, 28 Jan 2021 19:16:51 GMT

Trump & his supporters forget one thing, there would come a time when he was no longer President, thing is: That time is now. It came sooner than he and his followers expected, but as the old saying goes” it is what it is.

Comment #4

grwurston — Thu, 28 Jan 2021 09:01:53 GMT

Sounds like a copout...

Comment #3

lakerben — Thu, 28 Jan 2021 04:05:36 GMT

The people who worked on the pipeline just have to go to the union hall and sign the books and go to another job. Been there done that.

Comment #2

Stack47 — Thu, 28 Jan 2021 01:19:09 GMT

Taltz is claiming by barring someone from running for a political office harms her right to vote for them. I suppose because Trump didn't run for the Palm Beach, Florida dog catcher harmed her right to for him too.<br

Comment #1

lakerben — Wed, 27 Jan 2021 21:57:05 GMT

Yes sir!

Original Blog Entry: This is for people who don't understand why Trump's court cases weren't taken into consideration

Pick3master3838 — Wed, 27 Jan 2021 19:16:36 GMT

Not in good standing is misunderstood, so here's why trump's cases weren't taken. Your case has to have a leg to stand on before a judge will even consider looking at it. You have to show damage and other findings.

Below is from a law firm: