<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>Systems, playing strategies or primative RNGs?</title>
		<link>/blogentry/162341</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/blogcomments/162341" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Stack47's Blog: Systems, playing strategies or primative RNGs?</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Comment #2</title>
			<link>/blogentry/162341#c222379</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">/blogentry/162341#c222379</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 02:56:04 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Stack47</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>&#x3c;br /&#x3e;Read about a &#x22;get the results from 10 years ago&#x22; method that might potential if the they can limit the number of plays. I&#x27;d classify that and the &#x22;023&#x22; as spot plays which can be very profitable.&#x3c;br /&#x3e;&#x3c;br</p>]]></description>
			<category>Stack47</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Comment #1</title>
			<link>/blogentry/162341#c222351</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">/blogentry/162341#c222351</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2021 01:47:41 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Stack47</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>&#x3c;br /&#x3e;A few we had a discussion about the 023 straight combo that didn&#x27;t show in over 11,000 drawing (24 years) in the Ohio Evening drawing. Not staying past results can&#x27;t predict winning combos, but they can be deceptive and they are being used, it&#x27;s necessary to know how the combos were found and if the method can repeat.&#x3c;br /&#x3e;&#x3c;br /&#x3e;Money management is an important factor too and considering a straight wins pay $500 for $1, betting $350 a week trying to win $150 isn&#x27;t much reward for the risk.... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="/blogentry/162341#c222351">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Stack47</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Original Blog Entry: Systems, playing strategies or primative RNGs?</title>
			<link>/blogentry/162341</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">/blogentry/162341</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2021 01:01:01 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Stack47</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Have a lap top that I haven&#x27;t turned on in years and decided to see if it still functions. The battery was dead but fired right up when I plugged it into an outlet. It has a DOS based lottery program with data from every US lottery game. The owner of the site retired in 2012 so the data is no longer updated though I can still update which ever games I choose.<br /><br />I used it when I lived in Ohio and played Rolling Cash Five, but Kentucky doesn&#x27;t have a 5/39 game. Had a nice run by using the data to place the 39 numbers into an order playing the numbers in the lines that were consistently being drawn. Got about a 130% profit but not all that great considering the minimum jackpot is $100,000 and the strategy required playing a different set of numbers every drawing. Another problem was I played 14 number in a 3 if 4 wheel and even if I matched all five numbers, there was no guarantee of winning a jackpot.<br /><br />However there are several pick-3 and pick-4 diagnostic and analytical tools along with several playing strategies so I&#x27;ll probably take another look at those.<br /><br />Need some input and ideas from LP members on what they feel are better ways to use historical data and create better playing strategies.<br /><br />... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="/blogentry/162341">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Blog Entry</category>
			<category>Stack47</category>
			<wfw:comment>https://www.lotterypost.com/blogentry/162341</wfw:comment>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

