al gore---will he run for president?

Comment #17

Todd — Fri, 18 May 2007 23:45:06 GMT

You are plainly saying that we would not be at war with terrorists is Al Gore won. Maybe if Al Gore won, the global warming would be caused by a few suitcase nukes going off in America after the terrorists were emboldened by our lack of action. I guess I let irrational comments get under my skin more than I should. I would have to throw a switch and turn off all the brain power in my head to somehow come to the conclusion that we would be safer under Al Gore. Saying a stateme... [ More ]

Comment #16

Todd — Fri, 18 May 2007 23:36:51 GMT

At the time of 9/11 most Americans thought, "thank God Al Gore lost," because we all knew what his spineless reaction would have been. How quickly people forget. If you're now saying "I wish Al Gore won", and somehow equating the war in Iraq to global warming, as if there is a comparison at all, then I believe that qualifies as irrational thought. I am entitled to voice my opinion, the same way you most obviously did. At least when I provide an opinion, it is not filled with... [ More ]

Comment #15

Rick G — Fri, 18 May 2007 00:12:30 GMT

My negative feelings about Bush's presidency have not overcome all of my rational thought processes. He doesn't have that particular power over me, although I'm sure he'd like to.

Comment #14

pacattack05 — Thu, 17 May 2007 23:58:17 GMT

The main difference is dealing with the issue of the cause, is the case in question. What you're talking about is healing. Not related. I want to focus on the opposing views of why, rather on what to do next. Not that that's not important, but the debate is about the cause.

Comment #13

four4me — Thu, 17 May 2007 23:50:37 GMT

Also we as humans have really never looked at the planet earth's structure as closely as we do now we have raped it polluted it and used as many natural resources as we could all because of greed. As we continue to go our merry way happy in the thought that we won't have to suffer and so what if future generations perish because we corrupted and wasted the planet to the point of extinction. The thought process that we might find another livable planet to inhabit in a bigger fallacy than mo... [ More ]

Comment #12

Todd — Thu, 17 May 2007 22:10:57 GMT

Rick, I understand that you hate George Bush, but you have allowed your hatred to overcome all rational thought. I hope you were being glib.

Comment #11

pacattack05 — Thu, 17 May 2007 22:07:17 GMT

I'm not saying that we shouldn't be environmentally conscious, but let's not forget that people in politics will always have an agenda behind everything. They cherry pick info for their benefit and leave out things that might hurt their case. I just read recently that the sun is to blame. For the past 11,000 years, the sun has been on a warming trend.

Comment #10

four4me — Thu, 17 May 2007 21:19:11 GMT

Well i guess when we have to have oxygen strapped on our backs just to go out of doors to do daily chores they will wake up and try and fix it. Possibly they will alter the gene pool so new generations of living things can breathe garbage and still survive. Personally i would hope they would find clean burning fuel sources and stop killing the planet and the people on it.

Comment #9

pacattack05 — Thu, 17 May 2007 17:35:05 GMT

And by the way. A major misconception about oxygen is that the trees do not give off most it. 90 percent of the oxygen comes from the algea on the surface of the oceans.

Comment #8

four4me — Thu, 17 May 2007 17:25:35 GMT

If you cant see deforestation as a problem polar ice caps melting. billions of vehicles spewing out noxious fumes. concrete covering many areas where grass and trees once grew. wildlife disappearing. environmental pollution of all sorts. and the list goes on and on. Then you must be blind or have shut yourself off from reality.<br

Comment #7

Rick G — Thu, 17 May 2007 13:23:39 GMT

Comment #6

pacattack05 — Thu, 17 May 2007 13:18:33 GMT

The following is very long, so take time to see this when you have it. This is the best I've seen about the lies of Global warming. It first gives you a history of lies which hurt a lot of people in the past. They lost their jobs and companies went down the drain. Just one example is about the CFCs in the air which were banned in the late 70's and early 80s. It turns out that the Ozone layer has become bigger since the ban of hairsparays and other refigerants containg them. The list g... [ More ]

Comment #5

Todd — Thu, 17 May 2007 10:57:21 GMT

Al Gore is doing most of the lying. Run Al, run!

Comment #4

four4me — Thu, 17 May 2007 06:07:27 GMT

In 20 years....... when global warming causes the polar ice caps to melt....... and the whole planet floods. Swimmers will rule the World. Water world revisited <br

Comment #3

justxploring — Thu, 17 May 2007 05:08:44 GMT

I like Al Gore. Maybe he can run with that guy Chad who kept him from winning that last election. Not sure where he's been hanging these days.

Comment #2

emilyg — Thu, 17 May 2007 04:29:36 GMT

If he runs - he gets my ote. Iraq is collapsing - lots of lies out there.

Comment #1

Todd — Thu, 17 May 2007 03:50:46 GMT

Here is the latest report discussing massive number of scientists RUNNING from their previous positions about human-caused global warming. If you go back in my blog, you'll see that I have predicted this would happen a long time ago. http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.Blogs&ContentRecord_id=927b9303-802a-23ad-494b-dccb00b51a12 (Copy the link, and then paste it into your browser's Address line and press Enter... [ More ]

Original Blog Entry: al gore---will he run for president?

LOTTOMIKE — Wed, 16 May 2007 23:55:36 GMT