"did not identify any statements "that a reasonable person would view as defamatory."

Comment #2

Stack47 — Mon, 13 Dec 2021 03:40:49 GMT

<br />Because over 700 of the jackasses were arrested, the plotters believe they are off the hook. Wonder how many of the 700 will take plea deals and testify against the plotters? <br /><br />Is there a reasonable person that actually believes Trump's no proof election fraud claims

Comment #1

noise-gate — Sun, 12 Dec 2021 19:11:25 GMT

<br />* These other fools , namely Powell was doing it for financial reward. Rudy probably did it to shore up his dwindling reputation- Lindell to experience bankruptcy.

Original Blog Entry: "did not identify any statements "that a reasonable person would view as defamatory."

Stack47 — Sun, 12 Dec 2021 01:52:44 GMT

That's what US District Court Judge Paul Crotty wrote about Mike Lindell's defamation lawsuit against British tabloid the Daily Mail. People like Lindell must think everybody must believe whatever nonsense their feeble minds can conjure up no matter how long they say it and no matter how long they are proved wrong.

Sidney Powell's lawyer was shocked that anyone believed she had a kraken of election fraud evidence to release. Not only was Rudy's law license suspended, but he admitted that he never even looked at the evidence before presenting it to the court. Trump's cyber ninjas revelation managed to prove Biden got even more votes than the official results showed.

The real evidence is starting reveal an organized plot to overturn a legal election. The good news is Trump looks great in orange.

... [ More ]