They can no longer rate threads, Oh my.

Comment #9

Stack47 — Sun, 28 Aug 2022 22:58:58 GMT

Though I disagree that questioning where someone really was for seven years is "childish name calling", I understand your logic and responded without dropping to their level.

Comment #8

Stack47 — Sun, 28 Aug 2022 03:43:29 GMT

Probably wouldn't call him a nut if he was in mental institution for seven years but if I did, it would be factual. If he can prove his "missing seven years" weren't spent in prison, I'll stop calling him and ex-con/parolee. Saw where he finally posted something lottery related when reported Powerball drawings are on Saturday and not on Friday. Though that doesn't exactly qualify him as a "knowledgeable lottery player".... [ More ]

Comment #7

Stack47 — Sun, 28 Aug 2022 03:28:37 GMT

Explain the "missing seven years" and then will talk. Or are you his parole officer

Comment #6

noise-gate — Sat, 27 Aug 2022 04:32:47 GMT

* Parolee- is name calling, that's news to me. What do you call a person whos been released from prison on parole?

Comment #5

cottoneyedjoe — Fri, 26 Aug 2022 23:57:25 GMT

Calling someone a "parolee" is name-calling, is it not? Was it ever confirmed he was in the pokey? I'm not even saying you should stop calling him that, it is pretty funny. But you may need a ladder to dismount your high horse.

Comment #4

Stack47 — Fri, 26 Aug 2022 22:10:04 GMT

Most of my entries have links to articles someone wrote about news or political topics. The difference between the MAGA articles and the articles I link to is mine are opinions mostly based on fact. The MAGA articles are usually based on Kellyanne Conway's "alternate facts". Nothing wrong with being mistaken and owning up to it, but we never see any of them admitting they were wrong about their widespread fraudulent election "kraken" claims. Maybe being very uneducated is the reason the MA... [ More ]

Comment #3

Stack47 — Fri, 26 Aug 2022 21:24:39 GMT

With the old format, threads could be rated using 1 to 5 stars and listed who gave the ratings. Members have the option to anonymously rate post without commenting on why they like or dislike the content.

Comment #2

Think — Fri, 26 Aug 2022 18:49:49 GMT

I don't remember that feature but I have noticed that there are no more signatures on thread posts

Comment #1

noise-gate — Fri, 26 Aug 2022 04:45:34 GMT

*The childish name calling gets old, and to think these individuals claim to be married, that makes one wonder out loud as to whether their spouses is cut from the same cloth. Just look at those folks who stormed the Capitol, wearing masks to conceal their identity & carrying zip ties to tie someone up, but once the authorities rounded them up, the “ l was misled , please be lenient with the sentencing “ statements flow freely. * Still waiting to see the very first Democrat... [ More ]

Original Blog Entry: They can no longer rate threads, Oh my.

Stack47 — Fri, 26 Aug 2022 04:25:32 GMT

But stupidly believe in using the post ratings as a way to hurt people they didn't like . It's obviously the anonymous negative ratings can't hurt anyone or prevent anyone from reading the post. Any day now the MAGA whiners will demand an option to rate Blog entries.

Before the missing seven years got a private message* from the most childish one of them asking that I give a one star rating to a thread based on their childish reason. And apparently believe people give credibility to their childish political blog entries.

*Anyone wanting to read it, PM me.... [ More ]