<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>What would success look like?</title>
		<link>/blogentry/183529</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/blogcomments/183529" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>hypersoniq's Blog: What would success look like?</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Original Blog Entry: What would success look like?</title>
			<link>/blogentry/183529</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">/blogentry/183529</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2024 17:28:06 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>hypersoniq</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Systems and strategies come and go, I have worked on several over the years.<br /><br />With any system, what does success look like?<br /><br />On a new add to my system, the simple pick 2 is a 1 in 100 chance of being right. Once could be merely coincidence. How many hits would be needed in what time frame to consider the system a success?<br /><br />It is different for jackpot games as that only needs to work once.<br /><br />This is where I fall back to profitability.<br /><br />I am currently playing all PA daily games both mid and eve draws, roughly 4 days a week. Since I can use that to calculate total possible loss, I can also use that to calculate success scenarios.<br /><br />Breaking it down to individual games, the success scenario would be as follows...<br /><br />Pick 2<br /><br />To cover it&#x27;s own cost would need 11 wins this calendar year.<br /><br />To carry the whole system it would need 77<br /><br />Pick 3<br /><br />To cover it&#x27;s own cost would need 2 wins this calendar year.<br /><br />To carry the whole system would require 8<br /><br />The pick 4 would require but 1 to carry the whole system, as would the pick 5.<br /><br />The match 6 would require 4 [5 of 6] hits to carry the whole system, though that game also has the n of 18 3 line count, which could pay up to $2,500. A jackpot win on that would be life changing of course, but also cover the system.<br /><br />The first week brought zero wins, so to date the system has not been effective, but it is only the beginning of February.<br /><br />So I think I would define success to be any combination of wins across all games that cover the expense of playing to be good, and any combination that also generates a profit to be great.<br /><br />Seems overly simplistic, considering the odds of all games are as posted for 1 pick per game.<br /><br />Pick 2 is 1:100<br /><br />Pick 3 is 1:1,000<br /><br />Pick 4 is 1:10,000<br /><br />Pick 5 is 1: 100,000<br /><br />Match 6 jackpot is 1:4,661,272 (according to the PA lottery website) but is actually 1:13,983,816. They doctor the odds due to giving 2 quick pick lines for the one you play. Making those odds a more realistic 3:13,983,816<br /><br />Each of the above odds are present in each game no matter how many times I play the system.<br /><br />So, got a way to pick, got a betting strategy and budget, got an idea of how it might be measured as successful, all that is left to do is win...<br /><br />Now if only PA would stop picking the wrong numbers!... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="/blogentry/183529">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Blog Entry</category>
			<category>hypersoniq</category>
			<wfw:comment>https://www.lotterypost.com/blogentry/183529</wfw:comment>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

