<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>A new idea... not a good one, but  new one.</title>
		<link>/blogentry/188400</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/blogcomments/188400" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>hypersoniq's Blog: A new idea... not a good one, but  new one.</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Original Blog Entry: A new idea... not a good one, but  new one.</title>
			<link>/blogentry/188400</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">/blogentry/188400</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 24 Dec 2024 16:10:45 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>hypersoniq</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Since I put all that time into creating follower programs for MM and PB... and they each generate just one pick... why not try to play the generated lines for BOTH games? It makes no sense and has no statistical foundation, but then again NOTHING appears to work at any level, so why not? May not have time to run everything until the weekend...</p>]]></description>
			<category>Blog Entry</category>
			<category>hypersoniq</category>
			<wfw:comment>https://www.lotterypost.com/blogentry/188400</wfw:comment>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

