<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>The bet strategy for the system under development</title>
		<link>/blogentry/191341</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/blogcomments/191341" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>hypersoniq's Blog: The bet strategy for the system under development</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Original Blog Entry: The bet strategy for the system under development</title>
			<link>/blogentry/191341</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">/blogentry/191341</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2025 13:13:25 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>hypersoniq</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Since the core of the initial observation is a 7 draw window, it would be the easiest yet.<br /><br />With the pick 3 it would be super cheap. 0.50 bets on both mid day and evening draws for a total expense of $7<br /><br />Since the pick 3 and pick 5 have a similar window, but the pick 5 has no 0.50 option, that cost would be $14 per week.<br /><br />To play both would be $21 for a week.<br /><br />However, I have a general idea of indicators highlighting when NOT to play (narrow neutral spread)... this could make it even cheaper.<br /><br />Of course, the goal was to have the pick 3 pay for the rest, so between 0, $3.50 or $7 per week until a hit (straight play only).<br /><br />The plan is also to increase the pick 3 to $1 while on their money. Also to take a profit from any hit rather than recycling all back into the games. On a $250 straight pick 3 hit... pocketing $150 would leave enough to play the 3s and 5s at $1 for 3 weeks AND be able to get another 2 weeks back at $7<br /><br />So of course the overall design is one of cheapness.<br /><br />The jackpot games are a distant target, but that strategy will involve one line over whatever the window works out to be... so still super cheap, and also restricted to play on house money.<br /><br />Will probably fail like all others, but it is the cheapest one yet!<br /><br />This time I will track hits and count the number of times I had to pony up the $7 for each week over a yet to be determined test window. Perhaps I look at expense over 10 weeks and then if out of pocket was $70, then yet another system can be abandoned to the scrap heap.... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="/blogentry/191341">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Blog Entry</category>
			<category>hypersoniq</category>
			<wfw:comment>https://www.lotterypost.com/blogentry/191341</wfw:comment>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

