<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>Going to also include box play in the pick 3 strategy</title>
		<link>/blogentry/191666</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/blogcomments/191666" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>hypersoniq's Blog: Going to also include box play in the pick 3 strategy</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Original Blog Entry: Going to also include box play in the pick 3 strategy</title>
			<link>/blogentry/191666</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">/blogentry/191666</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2025 13:49:11 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>hypersoniq</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I have noticed in the back test data, that it might be a good idea to include boxed play in the next pick 3 attempt. The neutral counts describe straights, but sometimes the box of a combo would NOT be comprised of all neutrals.<br /><br />At a cost of $14 per week, a box hit of $40 or $80 would fund the system going forward. Even if the straight happens, the box would be the bankroll and the straights taken as all profit.<br /><br />There is still a huge number of combos comprised of neutrals, so a box ticket would offer an extra incentive to watch the week if I miss the NNN combo (which is highly likely).... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="/blogentry/191666">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Blog Entry</category>
			<category>hypersoniq</category>
			<wfw:comment>https://www.lotterypost.com/blogentry/191666</wfw:comment>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

