<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>Playing the last 6 draws in the Cash 4 Life test</title>
		<link>/blogentry/193843</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/blogcomments/193843" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>hypersoniq's Blog: Playing the last 6 draws in the Cash 4 Life test</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Original Blog Entry: Playing the last 6 draws in the Cash 4 Life test</title>
			<link>/blogentry/193843</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">/blogentry/193843</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2025 10:48:26 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>hypersoniq</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Two groups of 10 draws, each hitting $6 on 3 separate 1+1 events. This last stretch brings the total number of draws to 26, matching the window, and the net loss to -$196<br /><br />This exact scenario is why it HAD to be played on house money... out of pocket was $0<br /><br />There are still 6 draws remaining, but noticing a trend here, I did not do very well at choosing from the neutrals. Given how the pick 3 is now using the all neutral QP generator, it may be some time before there is another shot at the Cash 4 Life.<br /><br />There is still the option of making the standard deviation spread tighter. The budget minded system is still worth continuing, it was just more fun to play on house money.<br /><br />Here is hoping for another hit to keep it that way for awhile longer...... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="/blogentry/193843">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Blog Entry</category>
			<category>hypersoniq</category>
			<wfw:comment>https://www.lotterypost.com/blogentry/193843</wfw:comment>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

