<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>What the Phase 1 output displays</title>
		<link>/blogentry/194104</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/blogcomments/194104" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>hypersoniq's Blog: What the Phase 1 output displays</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Original Blog Entry: What the Phase 1 output displays</title>
			<link>/blogentry/194104</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">/blogentry/194104</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2025 13:16:52 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>hypersoniq</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>So now running the phase 1 displays statistics for each column...<br /><br />1. The first, second (median) and third quartiles<br /><br />2. The standard deviation<br /><br />3. The variance<br /><br />This section will eventually also contain the P value for the chi-square goodness of fit test.<br /><br />Then, the output that was calculated for each digit in each row is displayed side by side.<br /><br />The digit, the frequency, the classification (H, N or C), the percentage of the digit&#x27;s frequency to the whole model (150 draws), and now the number of draws since it&#x27;s last appearance. This is repeated for each column. So 0, for example, shows the data for 0 in the first column, then the second column and the third column. This stretches out 2 more columns when looking at the pick 5.<br /><br />The new metric of last appearance was easy to test, by comparing the number given to it&#x27;s position in the history file, for each column.<br /><br />Now, I need to figure out how to interpret the data. This first week the following scenario was used...<br /><br />1. Look at the percentages closest to the median.<br /><br />2. If there is a tie, use the lowest last appearance as the tie breaker.<br /><br />So going forward, this will be evaluated each week, to see if things need to be changed. Maybe furthest out is better? Maybe instead of the median as a guide, look at numbers about to transition classifications? There will be plenty of time to experiment until I have something resembling a phase 2 implementation... but the all neutral QP generator will be retired for the time being.... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="/blogentry/194104">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Blog Entry</category>
			<category>hypersoniq</category>
			<wfw:comment>https://www.lotterypost.com/blogentry/194104</wfw:comment>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

