<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>A test for lag in the Markov Chain</title>
		<link>/blogentry/196726</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/blogcomments/196726" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>hypersoniq's Blog: A test for lag in the Markov Chain</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Original Blog Entry: A test for lag in the Markov Chain</title>
			<link>/blogentry/196726</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">/blogentry/196726</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2026 11:45:33 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>hypersoniq</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Since I have over a week left on the Match 6, I plan to run a back test on the lab (script) version of the Markov Chain follower program. The data is exact between the app and the script, and the lab has it&#x27;s own copy of the data files.<br /><br />Test 1. Check for lag by deleting the last 21 draws and running the script, checking the highest output as it prints for a straight hit over the next 21 draws.<br /><br />Test 2. Using the 10 most recent followers that outputs with each column, see if that adjustment appears straight anywhere over the same 21 draws.<br /><br />By deleting draw history, the test has zero cost!<br /><br />Also, as a new year thing, I am going to begin back testing jackpot games as well. I usually stuck to back testing the pick 3 because I would not mind if I missed out on a $500 win, but without testing on the other games, how do I make improvements?<br /><br />I will go back 10 times, so the test will cover 210 draws, and I will repeat it on the pick 5.<br /><br />Then, when the Match 6 cycle is complete, I will run a similar test on that game.<br /><br />The classification portion will be used as a reference, so the follower data is not picking all colds. Guess we could say that will be the third test....<br /><br />3 picks...<br /><br />1. Raw frequency of the followers<br /><br />2. Followers guided by the most frequent of the last 10 followers<br /><br />3. Ranging for the pick based on placement in the Hot, Neutral and Cold table.<br /><br />Whichever method works best in the back test will be carried forward for the first cycle of the pick 3 and the pick 5.<br /><br />Hoping this will be the year I can do better than a handful of pick 3 straight hits...... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="/blogentry/196726">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Blog Entry</category>
			<category>hypersoniq</category>
			<wfw:comment>https://www.lotterypost.com/blogentry/196726</wfw:comment>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

