<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>First MM draw, no $</title>
		<link>/blogentry/197835</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/blogcomments/197835" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>hypersoniq's Blog: First MM draw, no $</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Original Blog Entry: First MM draw, no $</title>
			<link>/blogentry/197835</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">/blogentry/197835</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2026 12:31:44 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>hypersoniq</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Not even 1 number... interesting how 3 of the white balls were from the hot category, along with one NA and one NB. The mega ball was from the NA category.<br /><br />This illustrates how regardless of the stack of information I gather, there is just no clear cut prediction. White ball 51 was not even in the follower transition options for the third position... the mega ball was 04, the second NB from the transition, I played the first NB from the transition point.<br /><br />So since it is all coincidence anyway, at least this strategy equates to 1 chance per game... however it is yet to be determined if alternation in both games is the best move or just going with PB...... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="/blogentry/197835">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Blog Entry</category>
			<category>hypersoniq</category>
			<wfw:comment>https://www.lotterypost.com/blogentry/197835</wfw:comment>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

