<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>A new way to group pick N digits</title>
		<link>/blogentry/198424</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/blogcomments/198424" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>hypersoniq's Blog: A new way to group pick N digits</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Original Blog Entry: A new way to group pick N digits</title>
			<link>/blogentry/198424</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">/blogentry/198424</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 01:43:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>hypersoniq</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>We have even/odd, high/low, so why not try something different.<br /><br />Set one ( open numbers) = 1, 2, 3, 5 and 7<br /><br />Set two ( Closed numbers) = 0, 4, 6, 8 and 9<br /><br />Why? Why not?<br /><br />The open numbers have no enclosed loops, the closed numbers each have 1 enclosed loop, but 8 has 2.<br /><br />Mixes up vs. High/Low and Even/Odd... could even pair them up like mirrors etc...<br /><br />Inverted...<br /><br />1 9<br /><br />2 8<br /><br />3 6<br /><br />5 4<br /><br />7 0<br /><br />Have fun...</p>]]></description>
			<category>Blog Entry</category>
			<category>hypersoniq</category>
			<wfw:comment>https://www.lotterypost.com/blogentry/198424</wfw:comment>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

