<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>Flipping numbers?</title>
		<link>/blogentry/199954</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/blogcomments/199954" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Fantasy876's Blog: Flipping numbers?</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Original Blog Entry: Flipping numbers?</title>
			<link>/blogentry/199954</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">/blogentry/199954</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 18:58:08 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Fantasy876</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Back to back similar midday. I&#x27;ve already been experimenting with one number ups/downs but I&#x27;m seeing situations where flips need to be considered.<br /><br />If I had brought back the 1 and one number upped the 8 and one number downed the 28 and flipped the 12 to 21, I could have gotten four numbers midday today.<br /><br />1-9-19-21-27<br /><br />I would have had an issue with 9-19 in the past not to mention 9-19-29-X-X because I had this thing about more than one number ending with the same number. I just didn&#x27;t like how it looked and it just felt unlikely. I now have accepted that a number is just a number and any number can be sucked up.... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="/blogentry/199954">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Blog Entry</category>
			<category>Fantasy876</category>
			<wfw:comment>https://www.lotterypost.com/blogentry/199954</wfw:comment>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

