<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>VB 6 to VB 2008?</title>
		<link>https://blogs.lotterypost.com/jadelottery/2008/5/vb-6-to-vb-2008.htm</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/blogcomments/22547" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>JADELottery's Blog: VB 6 to VB 2008?</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Original Blog Entry: VB 6 to VB 2008?</title>
			<link>https://blogs.lotterypost.com/jadelottery/2008/5/vb-6-to-vb-2008.htm</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://blogs.lotterypost.com/jadelottery/2008/5/vb-6-to-vb-2008.htm</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 20:26:02 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>JADELottery</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Well, that didn&#x27;t go as well as I hoped it would. The JADE LSG code in VB 6 is not translating very well to VB 2008. I&#x27;m faced with a difficult decision on completing JADE LSG 2.0 in VB 6 as is or do a complete rewrite of the code in VB 2008. The coding styles and methods are vastly different between the two versions of VB and it makes it just as long a task to completely rewrite the code in VB 2008 than it is to massage the VB 6 code to VB 2008. Either way, JADE LSG 2.0 will probably be Open Source for what ever version of VB I use.<br /><br />... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://blogs.lotterypost.com/jadelottery/2008/5/vb-6-to-vb-2008.htm">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Blog Entry</category>
			<category>JADELottery</category>
			<wfw:comment>https://www.lotterypost.com/blogentry/22547</wfw:comment>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

