<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>Obama WILL raise EVERYONE&#x27;s taxes in 2010</title>
		<link>/blogentry/25164</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/blogcomments/25164" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Piaceri's Blog: Obama WILL raise EVERYONE&#x27;s taxes in 2010</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Original Blog Entry: Obama WILL raise EVERYONE&#x27;s taxes in 2010</title>
			<link>/blogentry/25164</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">/blogentry/25164</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 02:33:56 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Piaceri</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Obama says if you make $250,000 $200,000 $150,000 per year or less, he will not raise your taxes. By technicality, he will not raise your taxes, but your taxes will go up.<br /><br />Obama says he will not renew Bush&#x27;s tax cuts for the rich. He will let Bush&#x27;s tax cuts expire in 2010. So what does that actually mean? Letting Bush&#x27;s tax cuts expire would roll the tax schedules back to the Clinton years. Let&#x27;s do a few samples:<br /><br />Married, filing jointly, your taxable income (adjusted income less exemptions and deductions) is $500,000. Your taxes for 2007 were $147,206 with a marginal tax rate of 35%. Rolled back to 1999 taxes, you pay $171,161 with a marginal tax rate of 39.6% - a tax increase of $23,955.<br /><br />Yea, the rich get taxed more!<br /><br />Well, say your taxable income is $35,000, your taxes for 2007 were $4,467 with a marginal tax rate of 15%. Roll that back to 1999 and you get a tax break, right? Not really. Your taxes are now $5,250 with a marginal tax rate of 15% - a tax increase of $782.50.<br /><br />Wait.<br /><br />I though Obama was not raising taxes on people who make less than $150,000 per year? What is up with this?<br /><br />Let&#x27;s say you are married filing jointly and have $60,000 taxable income. Your taxes for 2007 were $8,217.50 (marginal tax rate of 15%). Rolled back to 1999 and your taxes are now $11,203.50. O_O A martinal tax rate of 28%! wtf? This is a tax increase of $2,986!<br /><br />Well, $60,000 is a bit much for the average single head of household, right? So let&#x27;s do the same calculation for head of household (single parent with kids) with $35,000 taxable income. 2007 taxes were $4,690, marginal tax rate 15%. Rolled back to 1999, taxes are now $5,308, marginal tax rate of 28%!! What?!?!? No way.<br /><br />You can check my figures if you want. The tax rate schedules going back to 1991 are on unclefed dot com under tax forms/taxtables.<br /><br />Obama said he wouldn&#x27;t raise taxes on people making less than $250,000 $200,000 $150,000 per year.<br /><br />I guess Obama lied.<br /><br />Or maybe Obama didn&#x27;t know the tax rates will go up for everyone when he refuses to renew the Bush tax cuts.<br /><br />... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="/blogentry/25164">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Blog Entry</category>
			<category>Piaceri</category>
			<wfw:comment>https://www.lotterypost.com/blogentry/25164</wfw:comment>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

