<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>Caution on collectibles</title>
		<link>/blogentry/27718</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/blogcomments/27718" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>time*treat's Blog: Caution on collectibles</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Original Blog Entry: Caution on collectibles</title>
			<link>/blogentry/27718</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">/blogentry/27718</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:41:31 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>time*treat</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>A collectible is the kind of thing you thought was overpriced at 5 bucks, only to find out years later someone is willing to pay $500 for one in the original packaging, i.e. way more than the thing cost new.<br /><br />There are too many things to collect that will never be more than conversation pieces: barbie dolls, old stamps, error coins, rare beanies, lionel trains, pez dispensers, antique cars, baseball cards, comic books. A few items in all of those categories have sold at amazing prices, but most items among them have not. It&#x27;s just money spent.<br /><br />I don&#x27;t try to guess what the hot rare item is going to be 20 years hence; too subjective for me. Too many things that can suddenly lower the (so-called) value, like a scratch, a tear, water damage, or finding you paid big money for a counterfeit (ouch!). I don&#x27;t want to have to be a specialist when I buy or find a specialist when I&#x27;m ready to sell.<br /><br />These folks below feel they were ripped off. I&#x27;m not so sure...<br /><br />I saw similar ads (see below) on tv and in print, and it seems to me they got exactly what was advertised in words and audio.<br /><br />I&#x27;m not sure if they were cheated or not. I do know that if enough people complain about a thing, even if they failed to RTFM, then the state AG will take their side.<br /><br />They could have saved themselves a bit of grief by asking one simple question -- How do you put multiple colors on a (piece of metal) coin? That&#x27;s what I thought, when I saw the ad. There were two answers; neither of which had me picking up the phone.<br /><br />... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="/blogentry/27718">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Blog Entry</category>
			<category>time*treat</category>
			<wfw:comment>https://www.lotterypost.com/blogentry/27718</wfw:comment>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

