<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>Mona Lisa a man?</title>
		<link>/blogentry/37268</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/blogcomments/37268" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>angelm's Blog: Mona Lisa a man?</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Original Blog Entry: Mona Lisa a man?</title>
			<link>/blogentry/37268</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">/blogentry/37268</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 16:50:34 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>angelm</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Mona Lisa a man?<br /><br />It&#x27;s hardly a new theory. For years, historians have postulated that Leonardo da Vinci was really painting a self portrait when he created the Mona Lisa. Alas, like most tantalizing theories, there was little proof to back it up. Until now. A group of scientists are seeking permission to dig up the remains of Mr. da Vinci to conduct carbon and DNA testing. According to a very popular article from Yahoo! News, the scientists believe that if the skull in intact, they could, in theory, compare it to the face of the Mona Lisa, by creating a virtual and then physical reconstruction of Leonardo&#x27;s face. If the skull has disintegrated, the scientists may have to move on to something a bit less glamorous, like determining if the original Lassie really posed for Dogs Playing Poker.<br /><br />... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="/blogentry/37268">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Blog Entry</category>
			<category>angelm</category>
			<wfw:comment>https://www.lotterypost.com/blogentry/37268</wfw:comment>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

