<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>Some Thoughts...</title>
		<link>/blogentry/38037</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/blogcomments/38037" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>pumpi76's Blog: Some Thoughts...</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Original Blog Entry: Some Thoughts...</title>
			<link>/blogentry/38037</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">/blogentry/38037</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 09:41:20 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>pumpi76</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Nothing to do i just thought i wrote this...About trigonometry...Just a hypothesis...<br /><br />Another alternative to the area of a circle...I am asking more than i am making a statement...<br /><br />Area of a Circle = Lenght of the radius x the circumference of the circle = or should equal the area of the circle (2 dimensional circle not 3 dimensional)...Or instead of the circumference of the circle it will be the radius x 360 degrees or 60 minutes if the circumference is a watch...But i wonder if the area means the inside alone of if that is the circumference included...<br /><br />Or you get a right triangle, a triangle with 90 degree angle with its 3 sides, hypothenuse and the other 2 sides...And let the vertical side of the right triangle be the positive y axis of a unit circle and let s call that side: a ...(Would had like to draw a triangle here but i cant)...Let s call the other side of the triangle that is the positive x axis of a unit circle both x and y are different...Look at the arc extended that unites the x with the y...Well if you look at the x and how it moves from positive to zero and to negative 1 and then back to 0 and then back to positive 1 while the arc recorrer it runs around the circle and gives a complete circumference...Hypothetically speaking in theory to get the area of a circle you will have to multiply the distance of x a couple of times oscilating going from positive 1 to negative 1 and back to positive 1, that s just the ratio/force/magnitude/step/proportionality/relativeness that you got to multiply the lenght of the line that touches the center of the circle and 1 point on the circumference of the circle to get the area of a circle...And if this is true then to get the area of a circle i think you can have the cosine or sine times the distance of x or the x recorrido of the particular sine/cosine function...What i am saying in other words is that you could use the cosine or sine function multiply it times a variable or proportionality times the lenght of the line and get the area of a circle...Or cosine/sine x the X distance divided by the distance of y of the cosine/sine function or backwards...It might had been the tangent function but i dont think so...Except that the measurements in real life will not be the measurements of the unit circle of just 1 and -1 but another measurement/reading...<br /><br />Not just that look at this page:<br /><br />http://www.clarku.edu/~djoyce/trig/right.html<br /><br />look at: D approaching A and C touching FG you can see the same thing so there is a function correspondance as A or D or FG which is touched by A approaches O or zero and as E approaches O and A...which you could use to get the Area of a circle...And as B approaches E...<br /><br />That s 1 way, the other way is:<br /><br />i was looking at the equation: y= SQUARE ROOT of 81-x^2....Well i was thinking you could get the area of that part (is like an orange cut in half and the multiply it times: the lenght of y times negative that lenght (mirro image) and you get the area of a circle or that circle...Same way if you took 1 quadrant of that equation instead of 2 quadrants and you multiply 1 quadrant s area or circumference times the 3 quadrants left back with their respective signs or maybe instead of multiply you do this: ^ which is more understandable and you get the area/circumference of that circle...<br /><br />This is only a hypothesis...<br /><br />Is funny to my the hardest if math classes is trigonometry and working with fractions nothing but fractions...<br /><br />i also realized that since in time on a watch one of the arms of a watch goes around a circle 3 times (seconds, minutes, hours) i realized that X amount of minutes is X amount of amplitudes of a cosine/sine function...<br /><br />Also i think that the circumference of a circle i think you could written as a natural base function...Look at the equation: y= 4e^2x-5 and look at: y=e^x-55....just need to give it more following and let it take direction or curve with breaks which might come in the form of a minus sign, or minus sign of the exponent or a polynomial using the natural base, or a series of the exponent of the natual base....<br /><br />... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="/blogentry/38037">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Blog Entry</category>
			<category>pumpi76</category>
			<wfw:comment>https://www.lotterypost.com/blogentry/38037</wfw:comment>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

