I have a question for those who object to the HEALTHCARE BILL

Comment #4

Tenaj — Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:17:31 GMT

HMOs hurt health care long time ago when insurance companies got too much power over what they will pay for and how much. It went bad when care was taken out of the hands of doctors and chemists (you should hear what chemists had to say when it first happened) and moved into the hands of drug and insurance companies who don't even do proper testing of drugs before they are put on the market for profit. Our health care system now is about profit. Affordable health care should n... [ More ]

Comment #3

Ms. Pat — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 21:23:22 GMT

<br

Comment #2

time*treat — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 16:42:30 GMT

The bill is very long and has a bunch of nasty things buried down in it relating to forced costs and loss of privacy, among other things.

Comment #1

Todd — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 14:50:13 GMT

The Republicans have been trying to enact the simple changes that you are suggesting, plus many others, and they are not even allowed to bring up the topics for debate. The only thing the Democrats will accept is complete control of everyone's health care, and that is un-American. It will wreck our economy and ration health care for seniors. If you think health care is bad now, just wait until the government controls it. They are not helping health care, they are HURTING it.... [ More ]

Original Blog Entry: I have a question for those who object to the HEALTHCARE BILL

louise black — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 14:27:36 GMT

What! wrong with having your 26yr old child on your insurance until out of college. why not keep the insurance company honest by not letting them charge gender cost being more for women because of child birth.Not keeping you from getting heathcare because of pre-existing condition. That! only a few of the policy changes.