Sunday morning pre-dawn Lottery Bible et al

Comment #9

RUBY-GLO — Wed, 19 Sep 2012 07:24:29 GMT

RUBY-GLO

Comment #8

Rip Snorter — Sun, 02 Oct 2005 23:32:02 GMT

Good luck, Jack

Comment #7

Tenaj — Sun, 02 Oct 2005 22:53:24 GMT

Tenaj is not sharing the workout on how she obtains the lead number and pointers. She gives out the lead number and pointers and uses the lottery bible as a tool. Yes, the lottery bible is just a tool of relative and associate numbers. The lead number and pointers are what makes it works. And they work from week to week. The hits can be obtained with the lead number and pointers using any method. So all of you people who are trying to figure out the lead number and pointers... [ More ]

Comment #6

Rip Snorter — Sun, 02 Oct 2005 21:07:42 GMT

Thanks for the comment and the distinction between what you are doing, and the lottery bible. I puzzle over your blog entries a lot (particularly the ones today) trying to find inroads to understanding number behavior. I appreciate your blog and the posts there, even when I find them incomprehensible, as I sometimes do. Best to you, Jack

Comment #5

Rip Snorter — Sun, 02 Oct 2005 21:04:43 GMT

Thanks for the comment. There's a lot of merit to what you say. I suppose it remains to be seen whether the pattern will hold for this system, but you have history on your side. If some of the people, such as Laverne Malone, or tenaj, who do understand the system will post predictions on the prediction page (or elsewhere) before the draw, and if the predictions hit, there's not much to argue about afterward. Whether the rest of us understand it, or don't. But if they don't do that... [ More ]

Comment #4

JAP69 — Sun, 02 Oct 2005 20:51:38 GMT

I am more of an analyst of draw history to find my numbers.

Comment #3

Rick G — Sun, 02 Oct 2005 20:44:24 GMT

I have always found that 90% of the methods posted on forums are non-descriptive enough to understand....shrouded in mystery, inconsiceness and extremely subjective "after the draw" to prove their worth. I used to think it was just me not understanding but I'm becoming prone to thinking they are subjective conclusions made AFTER the draw and the inability or unwillingness of the magician to show us how the trick was done. Being an analytical person, I would like thes... [ More ]

Comment #2

Rip Snorter — Sun, 02 Oct 2005 19:55:27 GMT

I've been scrutinizing JAP69s blog entries of a few days ago, and I'm wondering if he's not looking at the same phenomenae, but from another direction. But generally speaking, it's frustrating for me, as apparently for you, that if the questions are being answered they're in words that don't communicate anything to me other than what's been said already, which I didn't understand. Watch and wait is my strategy. Thanks amigo. Jack... [ More ]

Comment #1

LottoVantage — Sun, 02 Oct 2005 18:16:46 GMT

I'm ridin the rails with you on this subject! I'm a little dence about some things until my brain shuffles it around enough to get some of the pieces to stick together, but dammit I aint stoooooped! None of this makes any sense to me at all! All that needs to be explained is what situation creates a "lead" number, and the same for the "pointer" numbers. Is there a formula involved creating these numbers, and if so, what is it? Where are the lead numbers in the LB columns versus... [ More ]

Original Blog Entry: Sunday morning pre-dawn Lottery Bible et al

Rip Snorter — Sun, 02 Oct 2005 12:55:02 GMT