<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>Energy from ocean currents</title>
		<link>https://blogs.lotterypost.com/jap69/2010/8/energy-from-ocean-currents.htm</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/blogcomments/45157" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>JAP69's Blog: Energy from ocean currents</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Original Blog Entry: Energy from ocean currents</title>
			<link>https://blogs.lotterypost.com/jap69/2010/8/energy-from-ocean-currents.htm</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://blogs.lotterypost.com/jap69/2010/8/energy-from-ocean-currents.htm</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 04:49:02 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>JAP69</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I have seen a tidal dam and energy station in the area they are speaking of. This must be something different than a tidal dam.<br /><br />A better alternative in that area than wind turbines.<br /><br />http://www.edgenewengland.com/index.php?ch=technology sc=science sc2= sc3= id=109297<br /><br />another article dated 2006<br /><br />http://www.workingwaterfront.com/articles/Tidal-power-proposals-return-to-eastern-Maine/11341/printer-friendly/<br /><br />an excerpt<br /><br />The available tidal energy potential for the Minas Passage, Nova Scotia, is over 1 GW. Harnessing just 15% of the available tidal energy resource base would generate enough electricity to power about 120,000 Canadian homes...<br /><br />... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://blogs.lotterypost.com/jap69/2010/8/energy-from-ocean-currents.htm">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Blog Entry</category>
			<category>JAP69</category>
			<wfw:comment>https://www.lotterypost.com/blogentry/45157</wfw:comment>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

