<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>Court upholds $12,000 bank overdraft fee</title>
		<link>https://blogs.lotterypost.com/truesee/2010/9/court-upholds-12000-bank-overdraft-fee.htm</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/blogcomments/46539" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>truesee's Blog: Court upholds $12,000 bank overdraft fee</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Original Blog Entry: Court upholds $12,000 bank overdraft fee</title>
			<link>https://blogs.lotterypost.com/truesee/2010/9/court-upholds-12000-bank-overdraft-fee.htm</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://blogs.lotterypost.com/truesee/2010/9/court-upholds-12000-bank-overdraft-fee.htm</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 19:22:09 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>truesee</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><br /><br />Court upholds $12K bank overdraft fee<br /><br />ND&#x27;s Supreme Court said bank acted reasonably<br /><br />Updated: Thursday, 23 Sep 2010, 8:06 AM EDT<br /><br />Published : Thursday, 23 Sep 2010, 8:06 AM EDT<br /><br />BISMARCK, N.D. (AP) - North Dakota&#x27;s Supreme Court said a bank acted reasonably when it charged a customer almost $12,000 in overdraft fees.<br /><br />Lynette Cavett of Enderlin said the fees were unconscionable. But a judge ruled the Quality Bank of Fingal disclosed the fees and Cavett paid them for four years without complaining. The Supreme Court upheld the ruling Tuesday.<br /><br />Court records said Cavett challenged the fees when the bank sued her in November 2008 to foreclose on her hog farming operation and collect a $76,000 debt.<br /><br />Court records said from January 2004 until June 2008, Cavett was charged 842 overdraft fees. They varied according to the overdraft amount. The bank charged $100 a day for carrying an overdraft greater than $10,000.<br /><br />... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://blogs.lotterypost.com/truesee/2010/9/court-upholds-12000-bank-overdraft-fee.htm">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Blog Entry</category>
			<category>truesee</category>
			<wfw:comment>https://www.lotterypost.com/blogentry/46539</wfw:comment>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

