<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>The joys of already KNOWING</title>
		<link>/blogentry/4868</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/blogcomments/4868" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Rip Snorter's Blog: The joys of already KNOWING</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Comment #4</title>
			<link>/blogentry/4868#c3660</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">/blogentry/4868#c3660</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2005 00:46:21 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Rip Snorter</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>&#x3c;br /&#x3e;Lucky for those numbers they don&#x27;t have to try to prove or defend their randomness to some disinterested and unbiased mind.  They&#x27;d never pull it off.  Instead, they&#x27;re able to rely on human predisposition, so they&#x27;re safe from such scrutiny, innocent of non-randomness until proven guilty and no trial likely unless you, or me, or Lantern, or Four4me, or Jap69 can whup up some kind of understanding that allows prediction.  In which case we&#x27;ll cry their randomness from the rooftops to protec... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="/blogentry/4868#c3660">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Rip Snorter</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Comment #3</title>
			<link>/blogentry/4868#c3659</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">/blogentry/4868#c3659</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2005 23:27:48 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>ayenowitall</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>&#x3c;br /&#x3e;You&#x27;re wasting your talent here. You should be a syndicated columnist.&#x3c;br /&#x3e;&#x3c;br /&#x3e;I&#x27;ve been questioning the randomness of numbers lately. If a necessary element of randomness is that every number has an equal chance of being selected, I&#x27;m thinking that any drawing with more than one number coming from the same pool can&#x27;t possibly be random. With PowerBall, for example, the first ball is selected from a pool of 55. After that, the second ball comes from the diminished pool of 54. The third... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="/blogentry/4868#c3659">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>ayenowitall</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Comment #2</title>
			<link>/blogentry/4868#c3656</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">/blogentry/4868#c3656</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2005 17:17:37 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Rip Snorter</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Good luck&#x3c;br /&#x3e;Jack</p>]]></description>
			<category>Rip Snorter</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Comment #1</title>
			<link>/blogentry/4868#c3655</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">/blogentry/4868#c3655</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2005 17:14:24 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Cooljazzy54</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>You sound like a very interesting person.&#x3c;br /&#x3e;I will keep reading if you keep writing.&#x3c;br /&#x3e;&#x3c;br /&#x3e;Cooljazzy54</p>]]></description>
			<category>Cooljazzy54</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Original Blog Entry: The joys of already KNOWING</title>
			<link>/blogentry/4868</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">/blogentry/4868</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2005 14:33:59 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Rip Snorter</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p></p>]]></description>
			<category>Blog Entry</category>
			<category>Rip Snorter</category>
			<wfw:comment>https://www.lotterypost.com/blogentry/4868</wfw:comment>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

