<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>Shuffle Those Numbers</title>
		<link>/blogentry/5385</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/blogcomments/5385" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>JKING's Blog: Shuffle Those Numbers</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Comment #1</title>
			<link>/blogentry/5385#c4182</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">/blogentry/5385#c4182</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 22:51:44 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Rip Snorter</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>&#x3c;br /&#x3e;From my perspective a successful predictive system is one that successfully predicts the outcomes of lotteries, as measured by wagers/wins.  The success of a system can only be measured by that means and no other. If is loses more than it wins it&#x27;s not successful.  If it wins more than it loses, it&#x27;s successful to the ratio of wins vs losses.  However, by that measure, I&#x27;d agree with you.  There&#x27;s not a lot of successful predicting going on in the systems discussed on LP.&#x3c;br /&#x3e;&#x3c;br /&#x3e;Just o... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="/blogentry/5385#c4182">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Rip Snorter</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Original Blog Entry: Shuffle Those Numbers</title>
			<link>/blogentry/5385</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">/blogentry/5385</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 21:51:15 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>JKING</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p></p>]]></description>
			<category>Blog Entry</category>
			<category>JKING</category>
			<wfw:comment>https://www.lotterypost.com/blogentry/5385</wfw:comment>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

