Groundbreaking US Supreme Court decision on the 10th Amendment

Comment #10

Rick G — Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:27:46 GMT

Edit to my last sentence: "they will abide by it" should have been followed by "under Common Law jurisdiction."

Comment #9

Rick G — Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:22:47 GMT

@time*treat, Nobody will defeat the system by using the system rules on their turf (Uniform Commercial Code and admiralty/maritime law). Very few realize it but Common Law is the only Law. No other law can trump Common Law and all other "laws" are fictional. Almost all judges realize this and surprisingly they will abide by it.

Comment #8

Rick G — Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:02:21 GMT

Comment #7

time*treat — Tue, 21 Jun 2011 14:39:53 GMT

I think the ruling presupposes the case gets heard ... which is *not* guaranteed. ;-)

Comment #6

konane — Tue, 21 Jun 2011 13:58:04 GMT

I'm very encouraged by it. Perhaps they're feeling the pulse of the majority of US Citizens and applying it to what's written into intent of the US Constitution. That's real change.

Comment #5

TigerAngel — Tue, 21 Jun 2011 07:51:46 GMT

Thanx for the post

Comment #4

Rick G — Tue, 21 Jun 2011 02:42:02 GMT

The unanimous decision blew me away too. There's got to be something behind this. Not looking for conspiracies but this one looks so textbook.

Comment #3

jarasan — Tue, 21 Jun 2011 02:24:43 GMT

Thanks Rick!

Comment #2

sully16 — Tue, 21 Jun 2011 02:04:09 GMT

Thanks, Rick....fingers crossed

Comment #1

Todd — Tue, 21 Jun 2011 01:34:03 GMT

Great, great news. Very surprising (but welcome) to see it was a unanimous decision.

Original Blog Entry: Groundbreaking US Supreme Court decision on the 10th Amendment

Rick G — Mon, 20 Jun 2011 23:17:24 GMT

Goldwater Institute - Groundbreaking US Supreme Court decision on the Tenth Amendment

Short article here

If you see a freedom-lover crying uncontrollably tonight, don't worry...those are tears of sheer joy.

The Supreme Court has ruled that the Tenth Amendment not only recognizes the States' rights to challenge federal jurisdiction but it gives standing to individuals within the state to do the same thing.

The problem has always been that the States aren't in a good position to battle the monster. If they make too many waves the funding gets cut. Funding gets cut, voters get mad, they're out of a job. But by recognizing an individual's standing in challenging federal jurisdiction over their state, now you have a small army of free agents fighting the same battles from different angles. Some of those battles will be won. It's a win-win for truth, justice and the American way. Rule by Law instead of Rule by Men.

hmmm...hold on a minute...the more I think about this....something is very wrong here. This stinks more than a fema camp outhouse.

It's TOO GOOD. They have veered too sharply from their standard enslavement procedures indicating something is definitely up. Something that will make this ruling moot because it's too big to allow to proceed for more than a short period of time before bringing down the system.

Is this the freedom-lovers' LAST MEAL? Is this like some kind of 'happy meal' before the execution?

Or are they trying to foment a civil war of some sort? That's what the first one was all about, states rights (not slavery as we were brainwashed to believe).

All ears to the ground... something's brewing in their cauldron.

Full text of ruling - pdf

... [ More ]