<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>Protecting investors: part two</title>
		<link>https://blogs.lotterypost.com/jap69/2011/11/protecting-investors-part-two.htm</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/blogcomments/59995" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>JAP69's Blog: Protecting investors: part two</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Original Blog Entry: Protecting investors: part two</title>
			<link>https://blogs.lotterypost.com/jap69/2011/11/protecting-investors-part-two.htm</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://blogs.lotterypost.com/jap69/2011/11/protecting-investors-part-two.htm</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 00:01:22 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>JAP69</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Check about four blog posts back where they want to relax legislation on investor protections.<br /><br />___________________________________________________________________________<br /><br />This may not fall under the protections I posted but this is what happens to investors. These investors could loose large sums of money. This is not chump change to us lower %ers.<br /><br />Could be a lot of 1%ers in this investment loss who may no longer be 1%ers.<br /><br />http://news.yahoo.com/insight-mf-global-clients-face-day-reckoning-margins-203724552.html<br /><br />... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://blogs.lotterypost.com/jap69/2011/11/protecting-investors-part-two.htm">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Blog Entry</category>
			<category>JAP69</category>
			<wfw:comment>https://www.lotterypost.com/blogentry/59995</wfw:comment>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

