<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>GAT 2.2</title>
		<link>/blogentry/63191</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/blogcomments/63191" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>lottoarchitect's Blog: GAT 2.2</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Original Blog Entry: GAT 2.2</title>
			<link>/blogentry/63191</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">/blogentry/63191</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:28:21 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>lottoarchitect</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I have improved further my lotto numbers prediction software! The feeling is amazing!<br /><br />The following is an example of potential increase in hits production when tested at a 1/20 field (50 tested draws) (run time was approx. 6 hours):<br /><br />Pick 1: 15 (new version) vs 13 (current version 2.1) hits<br /><br />Pick 2: 21 vs 17<br /><br />Pick 3: 24 vs 21<br /><br />Pick 4: 27 vs 25<br /><br />Pick 5: 30 vs 30<br /><br />Pick 6: 36 vs 31<br /><br />Pick 7: 39 vs 34<br /><br />Pick 8: 41 vs 39<br /><br />Pick 9: 42 vs 42<br /><br />Pick 10:44 vs 42<br /><br />Another example of the lucky star field 2/11 of the euromillions game (40 tested draws, 20 stat. data. 60M tables (new) vs 500000 of current GAT):<br /><br />Pick 1: 23 (new version) vs 20 (current version 2.1) hits (1 correct)<br /><br />Pick 2: 31 vs 29 (1+ correct), 9 vs 8 (2 correct)<br /><br />Pick 3: 36 vs 34 (1+ correct), 14 vs 11 (2 correct)<br /><br />Pick 4: 40 vs 39 (1+ correct), 18 vs 16 (2 correct)<br /><br />Pick 5: 40 vs 40 (1+ correct), 23 vs 20 (2 correct)<br /><br />Pick 6: 40 vs 40 (1+ correct), 30 vs 26 (2 correct)<br /><br />Pick 7: 40 vs 40 (1+ correct), 33 vs 31 (2 correct)<br /><br />When testing this 2/11 on 20 draws I get:<br /><br />Pick 1: 16 (1 correct, that is 80% hit ratio!)<br /><br />Pick 2: 19 (1 correct, 95%), 7 (both correct 35%!)<br /><br />It has also achieved better performance than the benchmark set by LottoSync a vew years ago of achieving 40% 3 correct numbers when picking 10 (that was for the Belgian Lotto 6/42). GAT achieved that ratio at the new Belgian lotto 6/45 which is even harder to achieve! Similar is the performance at every lotto game tested so far. Lovely!<br /><br />... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="/blogentry/63191">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Blog Entry</category>
			<category>lottoarchitect</category>
			<wfw:comment>https://www.lotterypost.com/blogentry/63191</wfw:comment>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

