<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>Obama care contract coercion argument</title>
		<link>https://blogs.lotterypost.com/jap69/2012/3/obama-care-contract-coercion-argument.htm</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/blogcomments/64556" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>JAP69's Blog: Obama care contract coercion argument</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Comment #1</title>
			<link>https://blogs.lotterypost.com/jap69/2012/3/obama-care-contract-coercion-argument.htm#c76412</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://blogs.lotterypost.com/jap69/2012/3/obama-care-contract-coercion-argument.htm#c76412</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2012 13:22:09 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>time*treat</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>If it&#x27;s *really* interesting, save it to your machine.</p>]]></description>
			<category>time*treat</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Original Blog Entry: Obama care contract coercion argument</title>
			<link>https://blogs.lotterypost.com/jap69/2012/3/obama-care-contract-coercion-argument.htm</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://blogs.lotterypost.com/jap69/2012/3/obama-care-contract-coercion-argument.htm</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 22:51:29 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>JAP69</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I had read about this some time ago. I think it was an article about a Florida attorney brought this up. I was going to post about the Florida attorney on this about a week ago but could not find the article again<br /><br />This is definitely coercion. Buy obamacare or be fined or chased down by the IRS.<br /><br />If the supreme court rules in favor of the gov&#x27;t you are done. A favorable ruling could apply to all forms of contract signed under coercion.<br /><br />_______________________________________________________<br /><br />http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/obamacares-rewriting-of-contract-law/2012/03/23/gIQAVuFmWS_story.html<br /><br />excerpt:<br /><br />Obamacare is the first time Congress has used its power to regulate commerce to produce a law from which there is no escape. And coercing commercial transactions compelling individuals to sign contracts with insurance companies is antithetical to the foundational principle of mutual assent that permeated the common law of contracts at the time of the founding and continues to do so today.<br /><br />_____________________________________________________<br /><br />for more reading on coercion<br /><br />http://search.yahoo.com/search?fr=yhs-avg-chrome type=yahoo_avg_hs2-tb-web_chrome_us p=sign+contract+under+coercion<br /><br />... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://blogs.lotterypost.com/jap69/2012/3/obama-care-contract-coercion-argument.htm">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Blog Entry</category>
			<category>JAP69</category>
			<wfw:comment>https://www.lotterypost.com/blogentry/64556</wfw:comment>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

