<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>No to Keystone, Higher price less of the crude in the end</title>
		<link>https://blogs.lotterypost.com/jap69/2012/4/no-to-keystone-higher-price-less-of-the-crud.htm</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/blogcomments/64846" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>JAP69's Blog: No to Keystone, Higher price less of the crude in the end</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Original Blog Entry: No to Keystone, Higher price less of the crude in the end</title>
			<link>https://blogs.lotterypost.com/jap69/2012/4/no-to-keystone-higher-price-less-of-the-crud.htm</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://blogs.lotterypost.com/jap69/2012/4/no-to-keystone-higher-price-less-of-the-crud.htm</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 03:38:48 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>JAP69</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>_________________________________________________<br /><br />http://www.sunnewsnetwork.ca/sunnews/world/archives/2012/04/20120402-195920.html<br /><br />excerpt:<br /><br />So not only will America be able to buy less Canadian oil even if Keystone is eventually approved, the U.S. will also have to pay more for it because the market for oilsands crude will be more competitive.<br /><br /></p>]]></description>
			<category>Blog Entry</category>
			<category>JAP69</category>
			<wfw:comment>https://www.lotterypost.com/blogentry/64846</wfw:comment>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

