<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>election results controversy / Voter ID law constitutional</title>
		<link>https://blogs.lotterypost.com/jap69/2012/4/election-results-controversy-voter-id-law-c.htm</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/blogcomments/64994" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>JAP69's Blog: election results controversy / Voter ID law constitutional</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Comment #1</title>
			<link>https://blogs.lotterypost.com/jap69/2012/4/election-results-controversy-voter-id-law-c.htm#c76935</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://blogs.lotterypost.com/jap69/2012/4/election-results-controversy-voter-id-law-c.htm#c76935</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 22:14:50 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>JAP69</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>The DOJ must know this case too.&#x3c;br</p>]]></description>
			<category>JAP69</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Original Blog Entry: election results controversy / Voter ID law constitutional</title>
			<link>https://blogs.lotterypost.com/jap69/2012/4/election-results-controversy-voter-id-law-c.htm</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://blogs.lotterypost.com/jap69/2012/4/election-results-controversy-voter-id-law-c.htm</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 21:48:51 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>JAP69</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>http://nation.foxnews.com/president-obama/2012/01/02/will-obama<br /><br />-steal-2012-election?cmpid=NL_FiredUpFoxNation_20120102<br /><br />http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crawford_v._Marion_County<br /><br />_Election_Board<br /><br />excerpt;<br /><br />Crawford v. Marion County Election Board, 553 U.S. 181 (2008) was a United States Supreme Court case holding that an Indiana law requiring voters to provide photo IDs did not violate the Constitution of the United States.<br /><br />http://search.yahoo.com/search?fr=yhs-avg-chrome type=yahoo<br /><br />_avg_hs2-tb-web_chrome_us p=Crawford+v.+Marion+County+Election+Board<br /><br />http://usamericanfreedom.com/2012/04/06/update-how<br /><br />-obama-plans-to-steal-the-elections-through-scytl/<br /><br />_______________________<br /><br />http://technews.tmcnet.com/news/2012/01/12/6051138.htm<br /><br />http://www.altadenagroup.com/CSIA/post_details.asp?p_Id=9812<br /><br />... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://blogs.lotterypost.com/jap69/2012/4/election-results-controversy-voter-id-law-c.htm">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Blog Entry</category>
			<category>JAP69</category>
			<wfw:comment>https://www.lotterypost.com/blogentry/64994</wfw:comment>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

