Obama Quietly Grabs Power To Shut Down Internet

Comment #6

louise black — Mon, 16 Jul 2012 18:50:12 GMT

Please! feel free as for how ever many years you grace this earth ! Ask as many science fiction question as you like ,you people just don't make sense to me , you backed a President that started wars with sovereign countries and kills thousand of people and you find that to be Just! But because you don't like a good and decent man you accure him of all kinds of sick things .Where on earth do you think the President is trying to shut down the Inrternet lunatic talk.

Comment #5

maximumfun — Mon, 16 Jul 2012 17:58:03 GMT

For example: although I did NOT vote for our chief executive officer, I have immense respect for the office and thusly for those in it. That does not mean that I will vote for the incumbent. It simply means that although I do not agree with many of the choices made by our reigning President, I take a biblical approach and respect the position held even when I cannot respect the man. That being said - this here is a 'safe' place to voice opinion... and in NO WAY dimi... [ More ]

Comment #4

louise black — Sat, 14 Jul 2012 04:20:01 GMT

Please seek help!

Comment #3

sully16 — Fri, 13 Jul 2012 20:08:23 GMT

Yep, Thats why I posted the executive orders in my blog, this whole f-b-i thing and internet virus , had me wondering.

Comment #2

rdgrnr — Fri, 13 Jul 2012 17:06:18 GMT

Because if that happens, I believe he will take whatever steps are necessary to avoid giving up power. But that could also happen in his lame duck days. And then everything's out the window.<br

Comment #1

JAP69 — Fri, 13 Jul 2012 16:50:00 GMT

disagreeing may fall under political unrest in this country.

Original Blog Entry: Obama Quietly Grabs Power To Shut Down Internet

rdgrnr — Fri, 13 Jul 2012 16:05:19 GMT

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/Obama-seize-internet-emergency/2012/07/11/id/445083?s=al promo_code=F713-1

I wonder how long it will be before it has to be shut down because of a national emergency?

And will wide-spread disagreeing with him be considered a national emergency?