what if Obama doesn't veto the republicans tax breaks for the wealthy?

Comment #23

scorpio — Sun, 05 Aug 2012 01:41:08 GMT

I'll take mackerel anytime!

Comment #22

rdgrnr — Fri, 03 Aug 2012 03:52:51 GMT

Try some odor eaters in your drawers maybe.

Comment #21

Tenaj — Fri, 03 Aug 2012 00:14:29 GMT

Comment #20

rdgrnr — Thu, 02 Aug 2012 18:40:21 GMT

If you love fish talk to janet, she's got a mackerel for ya.

Comment #19

rdgrnr — Thu, 02 Aug 2012 18:28:46 GMT

Start there and then we'll work on the small stuff. Let us know what he says.

Comment #18

bobbya — Thu, 02 Aug 2012 16:40:45 GMT

Willard WILL NOT release Any More Tax Returns because 10 years of them he paid NO Federal Income Tax!

Comment #17

bobbya — Thu, 02 Aug 2012 16:27:16 GMT

The "rich"ALSO get 90% of tax subsidies and write offs specifically written for them. What the "rich' actually pay is far different than their so-called tax rate percentage. There's a big problem as to who and/or what pays their fair share when 2/3 of ALL Corporations pay NO federal Income Tax at all.

Comment #16

Tenaj — Thu, 02 Aug 2012 16:16:48 GMT

They just need to pay their share. You're suppose to pay according to what you earn. They don't.

Comment #15

GASMETERGUY — Thu, 02 Aug 2012 15:37:34 GMT

We then would not worry about the rich "paying their fair share". Besides, 70% of all tax revenue is being paid by the "rich" today. How much more do you want to squeeze out of them

Comment #14

scorpio — Thu, 02 Aug 2012 14:24:56 GMT

correct as now the congress is working on extenders to get through this year.

Comment #13

Tenaj — Thu, 02 Aug 2012 13:37:14 GMT

I think you should space out your meals, Ridge. You're smelling your upper lip.

Comment #12

scorpio — Thu, 02 Aug 2012 13:32:16 GMT

I love fish!

Comment #11

rdgrnr — Thu, 02 Aug 2012 03:58:53 GMT

"Good Morning, Janet," said the blind man as he walked past the fish market.

Comment #10

JAP69 — Thu, 02 Aug 2012 03:05:44 GMT

The dems are kissin butt for campaign contributions. They do not want to piss them off now.

Comment #9

Tenaj — Thu, 02 Aug 2012 02:55:07 GMT

LOL! He'll be going down the commode with the rest of his relatives.

Comment #8

scorpio — Thu, 02 Aug 2012 02:29:58 GMT

you are so wrong rdgrnr.Obamas'tax breaks are for the first $250,000.even the wealthy get that.you could possibly live on that,but most of it would go to toilet paper!

Comment #7

rdgrnr — Thu, 02 Aug 2012 01:17:54 GMT

The Republican tax breaks are for EVERYBODY. In fact, the lowest 47% of wage earners don't have to pay ANYTHING. Now, on the other hand, Obama only wants to give tax breaks to certain people and that's not the American way when you single out people for special benefits not available to everybody else. We don't want to go back to the days of discrimination. Everybody should get their "fair share".

Comment #6

Tenaj — Thu, 02 Aug 2012 01:14:04 GMT

My bad. It's Bill Clinton 14 executive privileges, more than everybody. Bush 6.

Comment #5

rdgrnr — Thu, 02 Aug 2012 00:46:03 GMT

Hey dorkio, promise you won't vote for him if he lets it go through?

Comment #4

rdgrnr — Thu, 02 Aug 2012 00:43:08 GMT

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/22/obama-executive-privilege_n_1617594.html#slide=more234306

Comment #3

scorpio — Thu, 02 Aug 2012 00:25:31 GMT

all we can do is have faith he'll do what he has promised.

Comment #2

Tenaj — Thu, 02 Aug 2012 00:03:56 GMT

more than all presidents combined.

Comment #1

Tenaj — Thu, 02 Aug 2012 00:03:15 GMT

He should execute his executive privileges as president like cowboy Bush did more than any other president.

Original Blog Entry: what if Obama doesn't veto the republicans tax breaks for the wealthy?

scorpio — Wed, 01 Aug 2012 23:58:10 GMT

I will not vote for him(Obama).