Paul Ryan: More trouble than he's worth?

Comment #5

rdgrnr — Thu, 16 Aug 2012 17:26:28 GMT

If that were true, you'd be voting for him, boobio.

Comment #4

bobbya — Wed, 15 Aug 2012 18:20:41 GMT

Paul Ryan NEVER met a spending Bill since he has been in Congress since 1998 that he would not vote"YEA" on to help Republicans who controlled Congress and wrote those bills for 8 straight years from 1998-2006 to more than double the national debt and spend more tax payer money in just 8 years than all Presidents before George W. Bush combined in over 200+ years.

Comment #3

rdgrnr — Wed, 15 Aug 2012 17:25:48 GMT

Those two words should bring to mind these two words - caveat emptor.<br />Everything they say is agenda driven.<br />They are in-the-tank.<br />It's all piffle.

Comment #2

time*treat — Wed, 15 Aug 2012 11:02:18 GMT

They're going for the "what do you two disagree on" angle, forgetting/ignoring that back in the old days, the person who became your V.P. was the one who got the second-highest number of votes for President (i.e., your nearest competitor).

Comment #1

JAP69 — Wed, 15 Aug 2012 10:28:06 GMT

The same goes for Obamas ideas on financial reform.<br />We have congress involved here on these financial issues.

Original Blog Entry: Paul Ryan: More trouble than he's worth?

truesee — Wed, 15 Aug 2012 10:03:23 GMT

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/post/paul-ryan-more-trouble-than-hes-worth/2012/08/14/7191d68e-e628-11e1-8741-940e3f6dbf48_blog.html?hpid=z7