<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>No, the Affordable Care Act Is Not Pro-Life</title>
		<link>https://blogs.lotterypost.com/jap69/2012/8/no-the-affordable-care-act-is-not-pro-life.htm</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/blogcomments/69902" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>JAP69's Blog: No, the Affordable Care Act Is Not Pro-Life</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Comment #1</title>
			<link>https://blogs.lotterypost.com/jap69/2012/8/no-the-affordable-care-act-is-not-pro-life.htm#c93358</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://blogs.lotterypost.com/jap69/2012/8/no-the-affordable-care-act-is-not-pro-life.htm#c93358</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2012 16:57:20 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>rdgrnr</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Democrats are 100% Pro-Death when it comes to babies.&#x3c;br /&#x3e;They are against the death penalty for murderers though.&#x3c;br /&#x3e;Go figure.</p>]]></description>
			<category>rdgrnr</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Original Blog Entry: No, the Affordable Care Act Is Not Pro-Life</title>
			<link>https://blogs.lotterypost.com/jap69/2012/8/no-the-affordable-care-act-is-not-pro-life.htm</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://blogs.lotterypost.com/jap69/2012/8/no-the-affordable-care-act-is-not-pro-life.htm</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2012 04:31:36 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>JAP69</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>No, the Affordable Care Act Is Not Pro-Life<br /><br />http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/278619/no-affordable<br /><br />-care-act-not-pro-life-william-saunders<br /><br />excerpt:<br /><br />So, no, the ACA is not pro-life on abortion. The paltry limitations on abortion in the bill are largely tied to annual appropriations riders that could be eliminated at the whim of a Congress.<br /><br /></p>]]></description>
			<category>Blog Entry</category>
			<category>JAP69</category>
			<wfw:comment>https://www.lotterypost.com/blogentry/69902</wfw:comment>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

