<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>Here&#x27;s the problem with Unemployment Rate.</title>
		<link>https://blogs.lotterypost.com/jadelottery/2012/10/heres-the-problem-with-unemployment-rate.htm</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/blogcomments/71409" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>JADELottery's Blog: Here&#x27;s the problem with Unemployment Rate.</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Comment #3</title>
			<link>https://blogs.lotterypost.com/jadelottery/2012/10/heres-the-problem-with-unemployment-rate.htm#c96363</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://blogs.lotterypost.com/jadelottery/2012/10/heres-the-problem-with-unemployment-rate.htm#c96363</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 17:31:40 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>CARBOB</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>They have to do something after the fiasco Wednesday night. I was listening to Herman Cain this morning on Neal Boortz show. He expects the same type of results from Obama in the next debate, about foreign policy. Obama doesn&#x27;t have the answers. He has the young college kids fooled badly!!!</p>]]></description>
			<category>CARBOB</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Comment #2</title>
			<link>https://blogs.lotterypost.com/jadelottery/2012/10/heres-the-problem-with-unemployment-rate.htm#c96360</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://blogs.lotterypost.com/jadelottery/2012/10/heres-the-problem-with-unemployment-rate.htm#c96360</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 16:21:20 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>JADELottery</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>&#x3c;br /&#x3e;Our best estimate is 0.08%.&#x3c;br /&#x3e;&#x3c;br /&#x3e;Yep 0.08%, now does that equal 0.3%.&#x3c;br /&#x3e;&#x3c;br /&#x3e;If it&#x27;s government math, maybe.</p>]]></description>
			<category>JADELottery</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Comment #1</title>
			<link>https://blogs.lotterypost.com/jadelottery/2012/10/heres-the-problem-with-unemployment-rate.htm#c96359</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://blogs.lotterypost.com/jadelottery/2012/10/heres-the-problem-with-unemployment-rate.htm#c96359</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 16:17:46 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>CARBOB</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Because they &#x22;cooked&#x22; the numbers, Doug!!!</p>]]></description>
			<category>CARBOB</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Original Blog Entry: Here&#x27;s the problem with Unemployment Rate.</title>
			<link>https://blogs.lotterypost.com/jadelottery/2012/10/heres-the-problem-with-unemployment-rate.htm</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://blogs.lotterypost.com/jadelottery/2012/10/heres-the-problem-with-unemployment-rate.htm</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 16:10:19 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>JADELottery</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>If unemployment goes down, we should see employment go up by that same percentage.<br /><br />So, if the unemployment rate went down 0.3% the employment rate should have gone up by 0.3%.<br /><br />That equates to about 450,000 new jobs.<br /><br />But wait, that&#x27;s not what happened.<br /><br />There were only 114,000 new jobs.<br /><br />Where are the other 336,000?<br /><br />Well, the government is good at telling you only part of the story, if at all.<br /><br />The rate that is promoted by the government is the U-3 measure.<br /><br />There is another measure that is a much wider view of Unemployment.<br /><br />The U-6 rate, it&#x27;s the U-3 rate plus more unemployed than you see in the media.<br /><br />The U-6 rate did not change from Aug to Sept; it&#x27;s at 14.7%.<br /><br />Now, keep in mind, the U-6 rate is the sum of U-3 and more other unemployed.<br /><br />So, if there are no more other unemployed being added and the U-3 value goes down, then the total sum or U-6 value should go down.<br /><br />But, that&#x27;s not what happened.<br /><br />This tells me the numbers in the U-3 value moved to the more other unemployed value.<br /><br />Simply put, the decrease in the U-3 value did not translate in to more Employed, and it shows.<br /><br />If there were more people being employed, we should have seen the Employment numbers go Up Much More than just 114,000.<br /><br />You should also notice they never express the Employment Rate as a percentage.<br /><br />Why? Because you could instantly see there is a Mismatch between the Unemployment Rate Going Down with the Employment Rate Going Up, or Up not enough.<br /><br />... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://blogs.lotterypost.com/jadelottery/2012/10/heres-the-problem-with-unemployment-rate.htm">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Blog Entry</category>
			<category>JADELottery</category>
			<wfw:comment>https://www.lotterypost.com/blogentry/71409</wfw:comment>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

